Printed on August 27, 2007
Not a Member? Register Now!
Forgot Password
Rehab Behind Bars: Pups on Parole
Las Vegas's "Pups on Parole" program is a great example of "The Power of the Pack." In working with the women inmates who rehabilitate dogs for "Pups on Parole," I wanted them to understand that dogs are able to experience more than one human pack leader. This is important because once the dog is successfully rehabilitated and adopted to another household, they will know that human equals pack leader.
As you know, I believe that all humans should be seen as pack leaders in order for our dogs to be able to instinctively follow. Dogs only have a problem with this when they are confused as to which pack position is theirs. If we don't demonstrate to them where they belong, they will naturally try and take the leadership role, even if they are not temperamentally suited.
Remember, nature tells them that someone's got to take the wheel!
Categories:
S2:Ep15:Pups on Parole, Eton & Dolly
4 TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://ngccommunity.nationalgeographic.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/367
Download Remember Me Ringtone from Download Remember Me Ringtone on July 17, 2006 9:51 PM
(Read More)
Recent Blog Comments
- I'm not so sure I believe... on 9/11 Science and Conspiracy Director's Diary
- Top international scientists have proven beyond... on 9/11 Science and Conspiracy Director's Diary
- I happen to watch this documentary... on On pursuit to film an extraordinary story in India - Part 2
- I just read Daddy's story. He... on HAPPY 40th BIRTHDAY, Cesar!
- Happy Birthday Cesar. I love your... on HAPPY 40th BIRTHDAY, Cesar!
Monthly Archives
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (11)
- March 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (7)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (4)
- April 2008 (8)
- March 2008 (7)
- January 2008 (7)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (11)
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (8)
- February 2007 (10)
- January 2007 (12)
- December 2006 (3)
- November 2006 (12)
- October 2006 (7)
- August 2006 (2)
- July 2006 (12)
- June 2006 (2)
- May 2006 (7)
- April 2006 (17)
- March 2006 (11)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (14)
- December 2005 (1)

186 Comments
What a fabulous idea, Cesar working with people to reahab dogs, it's a win win situaiton. The women gain skills and confidence and the dogs gain balance and new homes!
I keep gaining more and more respect for Cesar.
Hello,
I have a 7yr old Megan lab mix, and a 2yr old (jade) Sheppard mix. When Jade was a baby Megan took care of her, both are females. One day when Jade grew up, about 1yr old, she and Megan got into this huge fight. Which I have never experienced in my life! I have always had dogs and never did they try to kill each other. A vet advised me they are Alphas. Well I didn’t know what the heck an Alpha was, but as he explained they are both bull headed and will kill the other to stay the leader. I too this day love them both and just separate them. One in one dog run and the other in the other dog run. I really wish they would get along. People think I’m crazy and that I should have gotten rid of one or both. But I love them both and don’t know what else to do.
Thanks for listening,
Michelle
Well, just want to say I LOVE your show. I try to pick up any tips I can to stay leader of my dog, and my grandma's dogs. Her dogs have some problems though that I hope you could maybe help with? They are hisky mix siblings. Female Natasha is alot smaller, but way more dominant over male Boris. If he tries to come in the room she literaly atacks him. She growls and snarls at first, but if he doesnt leave she will bite him. Because of this he has become very... Jittery. He runs away if you come close to fast and he wont come down the hallway at all for some reason. They both jump around and 'howl' when sombody (including me) comes over. Well, anyway I hope you can maybe give me some advice on what to do about them... I do think Natasha recognizes ME as dominant, because if she is doing somthing and I approch her she backs down, but I'm not so sure she thinks of my grandma (her owner) as dominant... anyway... hope you can give me some tips,
Sam (13 years old)
"Pups on Parole" is one of the programs of Heaven Can Wait Sanctuary a non-profit organization of Las Vegas.
If you want to learn more about this great organization and its programs go to www.hcws.org
(You can also donate at www.hcws.org/donations)
I love the show, I Tivo it everyday.
I have to admit Sarah, I am moved to tears when I read how Cesar really is looking to reach out, teach his techniques and share his knowledge! It is so plain that he understands about "teaching a man to fish".
Michelle, it really doesnt matter which teaching material you look to for answers from Cesar - TV, CD/DVD or even his new book (have you got it yet? - what a terrific resource to refer back to for some many potential problem solutions.) You will hear one thing over and over - dog is not dominant human is dominate.
In fact you might find his approach at feeding time a great page to start from.
He has the dogs sits and serves them one at a time - starting with the calmest dog. he says they learn that being calm submissive has great rewards! (lol)
I do this now, I great the dog best behaved when I come, play toys with the one who is the calmest, even pet and give attention to the calmest and if any are being excited energy, they are ignored with "no look, no talk, no touch until they are absolutley calm!
Sam it is the coolest thing that you are looking to understand dog dynamics. Could you share a little more about who you have to help you, can you get Cesar's new book to refer to, have you seen the TV show on National Georgraphic?
The most importnat thing to know is that YOU need to be the pack leader! So you dont allow their behavior. If you can see Cesars show, you will see that he controls the dogs with just his energy and you can too.
Have you ever studied martial arts? Cesar did and it really helped him work with animals! If you can find a teacher, that teacher can not only help you understand about controlling dogs through energy but also experience how to do this. And what may be most important Sam - with a teacher like that, you can learn to sense reality danger, so you know better when you might be getting in over your head and skills - not just with dogs, but life in general!
Keep posting - we need people like you to help lead the next generation of lost people who need to understand their dogs!
Heaven can wait Sanctuary - god bless you for finding such a creative way to add one more resource to help our lost or challenging dogs. What a superb way to empower women and help them understand better about relationships in general as well! It would be great to have more groups broadening their scope for how to do these kinds of programs on a local level! In fact we are exploring ways right now we can reach out and generate more interest and activities in our local communities on our Dog Whisperer email list on Yahoo. If anyone else has such ideas and doesn't want to come by to talk about them, you post your outreach here I will pass the information on on our list, if its ok,(not everyone makes it over here) and try to drum up some volunteer support! wher people can interact with those of like minds!
Marilyn, I have just started writing reviews/more detailed overviews about the episodes because I am so tired of trying to remember which episode I saw what behavior or what clever thing Cesar said which brought a lightbulb moment so I want that on hand. and in 4.5 days - we can buy the Season 1 DVD - which will be so much better - we can put them in and have a Cesar marithon for our friends to help them see the light! -
Dear Cesar, How far awya do you make house calls? Wisconsin? Have tow wonderful dogs, Brittany and Springer. Both think that they own the hose, furniture, beds etc. I kknow it is our fault. One is very overweight, she likes to eat and eat. He is very nervous,barky and bad behavior on walks. Her also. I watch your show and know what we have done wrong, please help me understand it though.
Thanks Barb
Michelle,
You are not crazy. I understand you perfectly. I have kept two of my dogs separated for a year now, I could never give them away.
Try walking your dogs together, with someone else's help. I walk one dog and my husband walks the other. First two walks were difficult, but it's getting easier. Now in the parks they can be off leash together and not fight, but home is a different story. I want to try to get them together at home, but it's probably never going to happen, because I absolutely cannot have another fight.
CJ Anderson, I could've sworn Season 1 DVD is being
released a month from now (May 23rd) not 4 1/2 days.
I pre-ordered thru Amazon, and it will be shipped to me
on the day it is released. I thought their site said
May 23rd.
To Curious 1, Chula is a Shiba Inu the smallest of the Japanese Breed, she is a cousin to the largest Breed the Akita and looks similiar but a lot smaller. She is good tempered and gets along with other dogs and children.R&J
Rita & Jack,
Are you the owners of the beautiful Shiba Inu from
last Friday's show? She is gorgeous!! What a beautiful,
beautiful animal!
Please do not give in to the "dominance" training. This is the same type of training that was formerly (in most places) used on elephants and likely is continued to be used to break horses. "Trainers" used to beat elephants into submission because they too follow a hierarchy and the "trainers" wanted to be the dominant elephant. Similarly, the "dog whisperer" wants you, humans, to be the dominant dog. You may end up producing a fearful dog who act out when least expected. Instead, seek out POSITVE REINFORCEMENT training. It uses a reward instead of punishment or negative actions.
Susan
Your statement shows your lack of understanding. Your lack of understanding is sad. Your warning is unstable propaganda.
Susan,
The day I see Cesar beat a dog into submission is the day I will give merit to what you say. Until that point, however... I fail to see the connection. Yes... he does want us, humans, to be the dominant dog. I don't have an issue with that. I'm not afraid of the word dominant, and my dog doesn't seem to be too afraid of the word submissive. I think it's a lot of ridiculous negative baggage that causes those words to seem awful, and they really aren't.
See, here's my issue with positive reinforcement training - I have problems with rewarding what I EXPECT. Bad analogy most likely, but I worked at a daycare for a couple years. Some of the kids we had were unbelievably awful, to put it mildly. To the point that they were dangerous to the other children and the teachers. One of our administrators began a token reward system with one of the most difficult children... he got a reward for doing what all the other children were expected to do ANYWAY. Honestly, it was ridiculous. I realize these are children and not dogs and the analogy breaks down, but overall I take issue with rewarding what should simply be expected behavior.
Susan,
Unfortunately, many animals have suffered at the hands of brutal people. There are no doubt still dog trainers out there, who are also of a brutal nature.
Cesar is not one of these people, from everything I've seen him do or say. His philosophies are valid and accurate based on every dog I have ever observed, trained, interacted with, or rehabilitated.
There are also those trainers who are completely unable to set a boundary, correct a dog, provide stable leadership, or do anything except attempt to manipulate and condition, without clearly communicating with the dog, as their Pack Leader.
These "Positive Only" methods, are based on the training of performing animals, within a controlled environment to perform "tricks" for a food reward. That's it.
Positive reinforcement and operant conditioning are a valuable asset in any "trainers" toolbox, and are extremely useful and effective when applied appropriatly. Food rewards have their place, and are a valuable asset in many training situations. I use them myself.
However, the "Positive Only" training movement is based on fulfilling the needs of the human, and is filled with human psychology. It is skewed in the belief, that being the dog's "friend", (not his leader first), will gain you a "happy" dog. Most submissive body language and behavior problems are viewed as "fear", and many dogs become excited, mouthy, pushy, and out of control through the constant and excessive use of food rewards.
This entire philosophy is designed to make the human "feel" good, and puts the true needs of the dog, last. "Positive Only" methods are not reliable when the dog is not in the mood to cooperate, and the owners are not provided with any "tools" to control their dog in a difficult situation or in an emergency, by many of the trainers who call themselves "Positive Only".
IMO, Any philosophy and method which is to be deemed valid, needs to be based on the psychology of the animal, usability at the owner level, and results. Not blatant bashing and inflamatory emotional rants against other philosophies or methods, based on fear and ignorance.
If all you see in Cesar's methods is the brutal domination of the dog, rather than removing the burden of instability from the dog through calm/assertive leadership, and fulfilling the needs of the dog as nature designed them, you clearly do not "get it".
Cheney,
I TOTALLY agree with you 100%. Suzan, you have it all wrong. I love dogs and am strongly against hurting dogs. Cesar’s way of being dominant is through just being assertive and setting boundaries and limitations. Sure he is dominant but NOT the dominant that people usually think of when they see this word. Instead of dominant=aggression Cesar uses dominant=in charge and assertive. It is just like children. You can't just keep spoiling them with cookies and love. How do you expect them to be good citizens if you never told how to behave and what to do and what not to do? It really comes down to setting rules and following through with them. You don't have to be harsh with dogs, just firm and understanding. Set the boundaries and correct your dog when they don't follow them. Believe it or not, bad things do come from constant cookies and love. Sure, you can love them all you want, but how are they going to obey you if you aren't setting rules and making sure they keep them. If you reward when they do something you want, I'm not saying that is bad, I'm just saying that they won't always listen if they know they won't have a correction and don't have to listen sense there is no reinforcement going on. In the wild, pack leader will correct the followers when they slip.
There are many domination analogies that teach very wrong things such as:
Pinning the dog to the ground and growling at him so that you can show your top dog. The wrong thing with this is that you are showing domination through aggression, or a threat. This may seam like a challenge to a dog, or frighten them. Cesar NEVER uses aggression or harshness to show his dominants.
Another thing I want to clear up is the "punishing" you say Cesar does. Cesar NEVER punishes dogs. He CORRECTS them. There is a big difference. Correcting is like punishing except not using anger and being assertive with good energy and just straightening them out when they make a mistake. And Cesar's corrections are never harsh and are usually just firm nudges telling them they did something they weren't suppose to.
Cesar's way of "dominating a dog" is through a humane and balanced way that is truly best for the dog. I hope that you look into Cesar's work more, and then you will know what I'm talking about.
~Chantel
Cesar, My husband & I watch your show all the time. We put alot of your skills to use with our hyper 1 year old boxer, Tinkerbell. We desperatley need help with her. We have 2 daughters, Jessikah age 12 & Jaymee age 3. Tinkerbell jumps on everyone that comes over our home,(our daughters friends, family & us, we have to hold her down when the doorbell rings, she will also run out of the yard & down the street every chance she gets. We have to chase her & trick her to come back because she doesnt come or listen when she runs out, she smacks other dogs with her front paws to play & neighbors & their dogs dont like that, she loves to nip at everyone. She is hard to control because she does not listen. This is the first time my husband has ever owned a dog. It was hard to convince him to get a dog for our daughters & I just want this to be a great experience for him, my daughters & myself. Can you PLEASE help us???
Vanessa,
As it says on the main page of this blog, Cesar does not answer questions here. It sounds like you need to see more of his shows, get his book, and practice his techinques...ALL of you, even your 3 year old. You should also look into getting professional assistance and obedience training.
Vanessa,
I have two boxers and they are naturally a bit more rambunctious than other breeds. Exercise is ESSENTIAL and it needs to be structured walks and runs the way Cesar demonstrates. About the smacking with the front paws, I'm not sure if you can break her of this b/c that is what boxers do, hence the name of their breed (they box!). Mine do this in play with other dogs and my youngest has even taught my mom's golden retreivers to play this way!:) I would suggest trying to find a fellow boxer for her to play with. They can drain energy very quickly with another boxer, as long as you are monitoring the playing.
My older male boxer has aggressive issues that we are working with him on. Becoming Tinkerbell's pack leader will help, trust me! Good luck and keep watching Cesar's show and read his book, it's great!
Susan,
You have obviously not spent any time watching the TV
show, The Dog Whisperer. Cesar does not use the terminology "dominant" or "dominate" -- he uses the
term "pack leader". There is a huge difference between
being a leader, and being dominant. If you have ever
worked for a charismatic employer (as I do) you will know
the difference between a true leader versus a dominant,
dictator or tyrant. I equate Cesar's pack leader methods
to those of a charming and charismatic leader. There is
not one second of meanness in Cesar's methods of
rehabilitating (not training, REHABILITATING) dogs who
have problems. Dogs who ALREADY have problems are the ones
Cesar works with. He doesn't take a puppy and beat it
into submission and "produce a fearful dog" as
you suggest. His dogs are NOT afraid of him. They RESPECT him. Cesar works with animals who have already
been abused, and he disabuses them by exercising the heck
out of them. Dogs are meant to walk and migrate in their
natural habitat, and that is the basis of Cesar's rehab --
he walks the dogs at his center for 7 or 8 hours a day!
He teaches us that dogs must be walked, properly, in order
to calm the dog down and make them balanced. As the owner
of two dogs who were slowly becoming un-balanced because
I was using too much positive reinforcement and zero
leadership, I can tell you first hand that once I started
being the LEADER of these two animals, they have become
rehabilitated. They had reached a point where they could
have become dangerous. Why? Because I had been letting
them lead me. The entire basis of Cesar's methods is
LEADERSHIP. There is not one speck of physical harm done
to the animals. It is all done with body language and
movement. Voice commands are not even used. I'll give
you an example that just happened to me on this morning's
walk. My dogs saw a cat and began to lunge. In the past,
they would drag me down on the ground and I would end up
getting hurt. Now that I have learned from watching
Cesar, I was able to stop, look them both straight in the
eye, and say "Relax". I moved myself so that I was
blocking their view of the cat, and stood directly in
their line of vision and again said, "Relax". They
relaxed within two seconds, and we were able to continue
walking without me being pulled down on the ground.
Where, in that example, do you see any abuse or dominance?
I'm a small woman, and I am now able to control these two
huge dogs, on leash, when they want to run after a cat.
It is amazing. You are just plain wrong, and I would
urge you to watch the TV show a few more times to "get"
what is going on here. Cesar does not ever strike animals,
ever. His methods are the ultimate in positive reinforcement. I cannot stress enough that it is not
TRAINING, it is REHAB. As Cesar's slogan says
"I rehabilitate dogs, I train people."
Chantel,
Very well said! That's going to be one lucky dog, who has you as his Pack Leader! I'll bet you can't wait until next month! I hope all is well with you. :)
As Cesar has pointed out, many times, when a dog does not know his place within his social group, they can become unstable if there is noone in charge, and try to run things. Cesar reminds us of this in this blog.
Lack of leadership can be bad enough with a dog of a more "dominant" or confident nature. But when the dog is insecure and/or fearful, I've seen things get far worse.
To use unbalanced "Positive Only" training methods to manipulate a dog's behavior, and attempt to gain their compliance through the use food, does not provide a dog with leadership.
In fact, some of these methods can actually reinforce the dog's confusion as to their proper status, even more because these methods require the dog to make the decision to comply. The excessive use of treats, has the owner constantly giving up the food in their possession, to the dog. During the walk, the dog is often allowed to move ahead, because setting a boundary or correcting a dog is not part of the "Positive Only" method.
The use of the excited, high pitched "happy voice", is great for getting a dog "up" for activities such as agility, but does not help keep an unbalanced dog become calm and submissive.
Just a few things I've noticed.
Deb
K2,
WELL SAID! :)
I was going to reply to Nancy as well, but there's no need. You and others have covered it perfectly.
Nancy may be well intentioned, but like the old saying goes, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions".
I'd bet "a dollar to a donut" (wink), that Nancy will never see the replies and definatley won't have the courage to stand by her assertions and engage in a civil debate. Closed minds are difficult to reach because they don't want to be reached. I hope I'm wrong.
Good intentions like hers will kill dogs, that's the very sad reality. Look at various humane societies around the country that rescue abused and neglected dogs, to only turn around and kill them because they think a dog should automatically "behave" well. It's my grandest hope that his techniques will sweep the world of the HS and rescue groups and in turn we'll see fewer and fewer dogs killed due to human ingornace.
People like Susan, imo, stand in the way of that happening just as surely as those who deliberatly harm these wonderful creatures. She suffers from a different form of ignorance, but in the end it's always, always the dog that pays the ultimate price.
Again, well said, K2!
K2 - on the whole I agree with what you said, but you are clearly confusing "dominance" with "dominate"...dominance, as Cesar means it, is: "a : the relative position of an individual in a social hierarchy "
Whereas dominate means "To control, govern, or rule by superior authority or power"
Cesar's "pack leader" methods are to use "dominance" properly, but not to "dominate" the dog. You don't overpower the dog, which is what Vanessa is mistaking his methods for...you influence the dog to accept your position as pack leader, to accept your dominance in the pack hierarchy.
Oops! Sorry! I meant Susan...not Vanessa!
I don't think we'll be hearing from the likes of Susan again. People like her who have no real facts, no true understanding of dog psychology, and have done no personal research of canine history, and how dogs really live...Do just what she did, make a false uninformed statements, then run away.
I am still incensed by that posting by Susan! And now I'm
re-angered all over again. I just went onto my DVR where
I had taped yesterday's CNN broadcast from 10:-12 noon
because someone had said Cesar was going to be on. He
wasn't on. Is this shades of "The View" all over again?
What the H.E.double-hockey-sticks is going on here? Is
some group of people causing these appearances to be
cancelled?!
If any of these network people, or whatever, are out
there reading these posts -- I like to use Cesar's analogy
of "Dr Doolittle" when describing what he does. He doesn't
"dominate" like the elephant trainers and like people did
in the 1950s! Those days are over. Cesar has a gift in
that he can "talk to the animals" by using his energy.
They are never harmed, and they are never afraid of him.
Doggone, I stand somewhat corrected -- after I re-read my
post, and several others, I realize that Cesar DOES use
the word "dominant" -- but he explains his use of it vs
the conventional use of the word in his book. Bottom line,
someone has to be in charge of the pack, or household.
In my household, until I found Cesar, my dogs were in charge, and I was getting in a lot of trouble because of it. It's really all semantics, and I am astonished how
small-minded people like this "Susan" person can focus on
a WORD instead of opening their minds and trying to learn
something new once in a while.
My dogs are my life. I have no children, I work all the
time, I'm not close with the rest of my family and I have very few friends. My dogs are everything to me. And
because I had no leadership over them, I had gotten to the
point where I was not walking them or taking them anywhere
because we were getting into scuffles all the time. If I
had not stumbled upon Cesar on a TV show guest appearance
last November, I would still be sitting on my sofa with
two un-balanced dogs climing the walls. Now I am their
calm, assertive leader, and they are my calm submissive
followers. Nobody is getting hurt anymore (I was the one
getting hurt because these guys were out of control due to
my coddling their every need with cookies and so-called
positive reinforcement which did no good at all. They
were walking ALL OVER me!) I am grateful to Cesar for
sharing his God-given gift of "talking to the animals"
with us all. And I'm so disappointed that there are
people out there like "Susan."
i realize that this is a little off-topic, but anyone familiar with Corgis, can you please let me know if you know of a muzzle that will work on a Corgi? Mine takes his off in a matter of seconds with his paws.
Doggone,
Good post. Cesar uses the teminology correctly. In his book he clarifies this.
In my own understanding of the terminology in a scientific sense, "dominant" can refer to a canine's natural born "personlity type" or status, which can help them lead the natural born "subordinant" members, in a pack.
It is also used to describe a behavior, as in a dog displaying "dominant" behavior, rather than "submissive" behavior.
The "Kitten With a Whip" images this word conjures up, are not how this word is being used by Cesar, from what I've gathered. He also addresses this misconception in his book.
Deb
"i realize that this is a little off-topic, but anyone familiar with Corgis, can you please let me know if you know of a muzzle that will work on a Corgi? Mine takes his off in a matter of seconds with his paws. "
There isn't one. Once a dog learns how to get a muzzle off, they can get them ALL off in a second or two! What I do with my racing Whippets is "lace" the muzzle strap into the collar. That seem to make it more difficult for them to get it off...but no impossible.
Why are you muzzling your dog?
I have a queston, my dog sometime put his paw on me. Is thet a sign of affection or dominance? 'N how should I repsond?
jane
Nightsun,
Perhaps an interesting "dog behavior" term for these folks might be "fear biter". :)
"I have a queston, my dog sometime put his paw on me. Is thet a sign of affection or dominance?"
It's a sign of affection, but if you respond EVERY time with affection back you can turn it into a sign of dominance and an annoying habit. Mostly you want to ignore it, or if you want control over it...use it to teach the dog to "shake hands."
If you decide on the training route, everytime he touches you take his paw in your hand and say "shake" or whatever work you prefer. After a few times of doing that, put him in a sit in front of you, have a treat handy, and touch the back of his paw and when he lifts it, say shake, take his paw and give him the treat.
Once he has learned the command, you don't have to treat him everytime.
I'm trying to keep 2 of my dogs from fighting and hurting each other until I can get them re-trained not to fight. I can't afford any more vet bills in the immediate future and separating them only works for so long....i
I'm reading Cesar's book and DVR all the shows, I am trying to learn as fast as I can, but I'm looking for help in the mean time.
Leslie
That would be my question as well. Why is the dog being muzzled.
Jane
There's more than one reason a dog might put their paw on you. Could be he's trying to tell you something, or he could just be *demanding* effection, which should not be allowed.
Leslie
How about sharing with us the details of these fights. How old are the dogs? Are they fixed? How long has this been going on? When do the fights occur? What is your responce to them?
Muzzling is not the answer, seperating for now may not be convenient, but it's better than muzzling. You may want to bring a professional in.
The one "professional" in my area of Oklahoma wants $1100.00 per dog to train - can't afford that. Everyone else says to find one a new home - husband won't allow that. 3 year old pem corgi and 6 year ols JRT mix. Everyone got along fine (the past three years) until about a month or two ago. I don't understand why they're fighting - it's a look, a growl and wham there they go. I can't even tell who is starting the fights or if it's both of them. Both are male, both have been fixed for a long time. I know that Cesar has a DVD coming out next month on Agression - really need it now!!!
K2, THis would not be the same thing as The View, which is live. I happen to know that the segment on CNN was a taped piece and what probably happened was that it was bumped for some other news. This is very common in live newscasts. Often if there is a breaking or developing news story, they bump other stories to make time. This was most definitely NOT political. I can almost guarantee you that (as someone who worked in live news).
hi everyone,
i was glad to learn that boxers "box" i have a boxer mix-Shirley,she is 15mo old & is hyper. I didn't know they were hyper-my rotti is very calm. having watched Cesar's show, i don't let her "tease" my rotti into chasing her, he gets a bit aggresive with her when she won't leave him alone. other than that, i have been very fortunate that all my dogs have gotten along, at one point, we had 5. also I would like to say that i think the word "dominate" has a bad rep, because in today's society dominate makes people think of "abuse" as with children, but being a leader is a healty form of domination, it is structure, leadership, out of love/careing. we all need that, we need to give it to our dogs too. I am now able to walk my 2 dogs side by side, because i'm able to control my boxer. I can't thank Cesar enough for the insight I'm learning into the dog nature.
i am triing to find some information out from cesar about my greyhound. i think he may be the only one who can help me i am at a loss as to what to do. my dog when he goes for a walk with me if he sees another dog he comes back at me so i muzzle him so he doesnt get me he doesnt bite but he only seeems to do that to me and noone else what am i doing wrong i just wish i could take him anytime of the day and he would be normal and not come back at me. i am at a loss for what to do. so if cesar could help me with that that would be great cuz it is often very dishearting to even take him i have to take him certain times of the day and always have to look around the whole time and wonder if i am going to see another dog so please help thanks shelley higdon
I know this is way off subject, but I have an awful situation that just occured at a local shelter and I need to tell someone.
A couple of days ago a woman I know had her dog lost when she was out of town, on her return she contacted all the shelters in the area and had no luck. She visited the Utah County Animal Shelter just south of Salt Lake City, and was told that they had just put down a white lab. The dog ended up being her dog. What makes me sick is the dog was chipped and they made no attempt to contact her. They said the dog had a broken leg, so the owner proceded to get her dogs body and take it to her vet for x-rays, no break was found. The dog was not held for the minimum 5 days and these people took it upon themselves to make a life ending decision without even attempting to contact the owner. To top it all off the woman is well know in the rescue world here and is well known at the very shelter that killed her dog, she runs the Utah Lab Rescue and has pulled hundreds of dogs from that very shelter.
This whole situation just makes me sick I run a rescue and it is not easy, but when the ignorant are in charge of these animals when they come into the governments care what can we do? They are running a concentration camp, not a shelter.
Sorry I just had to get that off my chest, if you want to put in your 2 cents feel free to contact Utah County Animal Services, we are doing what we can so this will not happen again. This woman did everything right to find her dog, this shelter didn't even give her or her dog a chance.
Shelley,
"my dog when he goes for a walk with me if he sees another dog he comes back at me so i muzzle him"
When you say he "comes back at you" I presume you mean he tries to bite you (since you muzzle him). What you have is a displacement biter (he bites you because he can't get at the other dog), and he IS a RED ZONE case and you NEED professional help.
In the meantime, you need to get Cesar's book and his first video, and when it becomes available - the first season of shows. One of his early shows involved a dog that did the same thing to HIS owner.
That your dog will bite you, or even try, is proof you are not the pack leader and you need to work on that. In the meantime I would suggest keeping him muzzled when you walk him, because then YOU will not be afraid that he will bite you.
Don't use the muzzle as a crutch though...your goal is to get him calm and submissive, so you don't need it anymore. But if it helps give you the confidence to help you become the pack leader, then use it.
Wow HB, that is an awful situation! I'm so sorry for that woman's loss of her pet. It makes it pretty disheartening for those that are actually responsible pet owners.
Ruso was spotted stranded on a sandbar in the middle of the Kentucky river. It was December, and there was ice in the river. By the time animal control finally arrived, his feet were bloody from the frozen sand. They spooked him and he fell into the river then went through a lock. When pulled from the river he had almost drowned,and weighed only 35 pounds. We adopted him a month later. He appears to be a Borzoi/collie mix. After living with us for over a year, he now weighs 55 pounds and the vet says he is healthy. He will not go outside if he hears thunder or an airplane overhead. He will go more than 24 hours without relieving himself. He eats irregularly, often going several days between meals. He will not drink water in our house. He only drinks outside or on our screened porch. He is gentle, quiet, appears never to have been abused,is good with children, the disable, and other animals. He rides long distances extremely well. Our main problem with him is that he asks to go outside and then he does not relieve himself. We wish we knew his history so that we might better understand him. I'd appreciate any insight into his idiosyncrasies ? Thanks
There was another incident in Utah where 5 dogs that were slated to go to another no kill rescue orgainzation were euthanized even though they had been tagged for the no kill organization. There was an investigation, because the head of the no kill organization had a disagreement with the head of the animal shelter. She claimed that the dogs were euthanized because of the disagreement. I never heard if they resolved it. I agree that it is very sad when animals have to pay with their lives for human mistakes. I hope this is also investigated and some failsafes implemented so this tragedy does not reoccur.
Here's a funny story in the paper I read. Well it's funny, but goes to show how little dogs can be very mean too.
A guy is walking his pit-bull down the street and a little Pomeranian comes running up to him barking and started to attack his pit-bull. The Pomer bit the pit-bull on the paws and drew blood and also was able to bite the pit on the top of the head. While the only thing the pit did was pick up the little dog in it's mouth and threw it off to the side, kinda like how they do with ragtoys. The Pomer wasn't hurt by it, the pit just wanted to get the little guy away from him.
Also that wasn't the first time that Pomer has attacked that pit. See it goes to show that any dog, whether your big or small can be dangerous if the dog isn't well-balanced. Clearly the Pomeranian isn't well-balanced and has some aggression issues. It's just nice to see in the paper a story about a different breed of dog attacking a Pit. Usually you only hear about the Pit attacks and nothing else.
Remember, it's Animal, Dog, Breed, Name. Not, Name, Breed, Human.
Why are ther so many shelters and rescue groups? Because so many humans think of dogs as a piece of furniture, to look nice, but thrown out like trash when the mood strikes them. They do not see the dog as a living being, one of consciousness, a living spirit ,that regardless of how it's humans will treat him/her, would never trade them in. The there's the people who buy dogs, never giving thought to maybe learning what it takes to actually raise one. I truely don't understand it. But I will do my best to help change it.
I know a word hated and fear by many humans, a word that causes a flood of emotions to occer. From joy to some, to down right temper tamtrum
I do not have a dog. I have never had a dog. Someday, I will have a dog and when I do, Cesar's knowledge will come in very useful.
I started to learn by going to dog shows and asking questions. It did not take long for me to discover a local no-kill animal shelter. They offered an orientation class for volunteers and I signed up to become a canine companion. There were many evenings when I would stop by afer work to walk dogs (and I really, really really could have used Cesar's information on how to walk dogs, among other things!).
Eventually, I became an animal care attendent as a second job and spent four evenings per week at the shelter. I left the shelter after a few months and became involved in a German Shepherd rescue organization. All along the way, I came across dogs with issues. If I had only known the key words: exercise, discipline and affection... starting several years ago.
I just bought a copy of Cesar's Way and am reading it through for the second time. It is my hope that more people will discover this website, The Dog Whisperer show and devote more time and effort to discover what dogs truly need and want.
I HAVE A CONFESSION... as most of you know that read this, I have a 5 month old boxer who is very energetic ( as most boxers are!). We have made a lot of progress with the walk and are working on trying to be calm when anybody comes to our house. Well, when I was at the vet's office to discuss her being spayed next month I mentioned that I was trying to get her to calm down when people came to our house because she jumps on everyone (including my 72 year old mother). The vet(small town) said I should roll up a newspapaer and pop her on the rump. I know everyone must be cringing about now, but the next day my mother came to visit and she was already in the house working on a crossword puzzle from the paper when Beulah came in from the backyard and saw her and she automatically came running and was about to try to jump in my mother's lap when I told her what the vet said. She told Beulah no and swatted her with the paper (about 3 sheets) and lo and behold the dog never bothered her again for the rest of her visit. I know this goes against everything Cesar teaches but I'll have to admit it worked wonders for this situation. Nobody else has come to visit and I am unsure whether to try the newspaper or try other methods the next time we have a visitor. What do ya'll think?
HB, That is awful. How sad. I recently shared a story
about a dog I had seen at our local animal control
department's kennel (which you can see from the road as
you drive past). Since it was school vacation week here,
I contacted them and suggested that this dog, who had
been in the kennel for TEN DAYS might have been owned by
a family on vacation. Thankfully they informed me that
our animal control dept is a no-kill facility, and that
the dog needs a home. They gave me a full description of
the dog, and I passed the word to everyone I knew. A
woman who works for me may adopt the dog for her 12 year
old son. I am so happy that dog will not be euthanized.
On a news story last night on our local channel, they
reported about a cat who had been tossed out the window
of a moving car and onto a playground where a bunch of
children were playing in the middle of the afternoon!
Someone adopted the cat, but can you imagine how traumatized those poor kids were to have seen that?!
When they interviewed the animal shelter people, the
camera panned on about 6 or 7 cats, at least half of
whom were left behind in their homes or on the doorstep
of the shelter just because the family was moving away.
lj, Thanks for the info about the news broadcast. There
weren't any really breaking stories yesterday -- in fact
there seemed to have been an awful lot of "filler" type
stories. But what-EVER! Maybe it will be shown at
another time.
Kay Yount, my "step-daughter" had a dog that she had found
abandoned and starving, and he behaved exactly the same
way as you describe. He would not eliminate for 24 hours, or even longer. He would not eat if she was not present.
And he would only drink out of one water bowl, and only
if it was in a specific place. They lived with us for
6 months, and he behaved this way the whole time. We have
no idea of his background, but assumed he was abused and
abandoned. When she found him, he had heartworm really
bad and only weighed like 30 pounds (purebred Collie, so
he should've weighed a LOT more!) He also rode long
distances very well (she would drive back and forth
from Chicago to Boston frequently) and he was the sweetest,
gentlest dog I've ever known. He loved everybody. She
ended up just living with his idiosyncracies and
accommodating his special needs, much like someone would
do with a special needs human.
Missy- Dogs learn in spite of these tactics, not because of them. You will create fear of you and rolled up newspapers. Be patient the dog will learn.
Question Please!!!!!!
I just walked Roman with my new walking buddy (I posted about it on the "Cesar in Washington, DC This Weekend!" blog & had a BLAST!) & her and her hubby will be getting married in June.
We plan on walking our dogs together every evening AND on the weekends, so we will get to know each other and our dogs VERY well by June I believe.
Since her dog is a Mastiff and a male (he will be nuetered soon but isn't yet) and is only 10 months old....do you think that by June our dogs having walked as a pack together AND playing together almost every day it would be safe to dog watch for her when they go on their honeymoon, if she needs someone responsible???
Thanks Debbie,
I am very excited for next month! Right when I get out of school, I hope to get my dog. I have been researching and looking like crazy for a great dog to adopt but I still have not found the right one for me. Every time I do find one, the rescue wants alot for it. I only have $300 to pay for my dog and all the other things (food, health, ect.)
I am leaning towards getting a border collie. I have seen many in shelters. If anyone is an expert on border collies, I'm all ears. I'm still keeping my eye out for other dogs. I'm just afraid I'll get the wrong dog, especially sence this will be my first. I'm a little worried. I'm not too worried about the training part and establishing rules, boundaries, and limitations, I'm afraid that I'll rescue a dog that will have health problems later on. Then I'd be paying bills and be in the hole. I've heard about border collies, and collies having joint problems. The reason I want a collie or border collie is because they are so smart and would be easier to train.
I really hope everything goes smoothly. If anyone has any advice for a first-timer, that would be great!
~Chantel
Missy,
Most methods like hitting your dog give instant results which is why many poeple do these things. The problem is that even though the dog shows submission to you now, and stops the behavior she was doing, hitting the dog is only going to create different problems. Such as: aggresion or fear. Hitting the dog will show that you are an aggresive pack leader and therefore you are imbalanced. This may show your dog you are not a good pack leader for your pack and may try to take over. Your dog could also rebell against you when you least expect it. Your dog will not trust you and become imbalanced. This "wacking with the newspaper" idea may not seem like a big deel, but your dog is always watching you and expecting a good pack leader in EVERYTHING you do. You are an example to your dog, and when you slip it will be like a chain reaction to your dog.
I see hitting your dog as punishment and not correcting. Yelling or hitting a dog through anger and frustration, is punishment. Correcting your dog is just expecting, and just straightening him out when they don't follow the rules that you set. A firm nudge is a good indicater that they're doing something they aren't suppose to.
It's funny how little things that we do can effect our dogs, so always make sure you are being a calm and assertive pack leader.
~Chantel
Actaully Cantel, that's not 100% accurate. First off,she stated her mother "hit" the dog with three sheets of paper. One could even argue as to whether it was a hit or a touch, the paper being light as a feather, and no more than an extension of her person. Just as there are different ways of giving a correction, a correction that works on one dog may not work on another. Also, pack leaders are for the most part...NOT...gentile in their corrections of pack members. I personally do not hit dogs with my hands, nor do I kick them. However, who is to say that tapping a dog with a rolled up news paper is any different than using a choke, pinch, or e-collar, or poking it with your fingers (as to mimic a bite).
Corrections fail when they are unfair, improper, done out of anger or fustration.
Calm assertive pack leader does not mean, a pack leader who will not correct those below him.
True^^about the extension of the arm. Remember the last episode I believe where Cesar used a long stick to get the dog where he wanted him to go. (With the old lady and her daughter) that episode. Cesar say he was only using the stick as an extension of his own arm.
But if you also pick an object and hit the dog with it, the dog will learn to fear that object everytime you pick it up, and we don't want the dog to have fear. So I wouldn't do that. Dogs in the wild don't hit each other with objects, do they? Exactly. Pinch (prong collar) collar are suppose to mimic a bite, a natural act in the wild. Anyway another way you can stop the dog from jumping is just use the leash and everytime it gets ready to jump you correct it. So you have to anticipate it and stop it before it happens. You can also stop it before it happens w/o a leash too.
There's more than one way to do things, even Cesar agrees with that, but I think we can all agree hitting shouldn't occur.
Anyway,
Chantel, if you get a Border Collie, you'll be getting a very very very very active breed of dog. Since they were bred to herd, they need lots of physical and mental challenge.
I had a client who had a Border Collie and I had to help with the dog, because when the little kids would play, the dog would herd the kids, the dog would stay on the outside of the them and occasionally nip at them to keep them close together, it was quite a sight to see.
So if you want a border collie, I hope you are very active. If you don't give them what they need, you'll get most likely an aggressive dog, a frustrated dog, etc...That's also true with any dog though.
So give it Exercise, Discipline and Affection ,etc.. blah blah blah and that should make everything a lot easier.
When your dog paws at you it's means friendship or I'm sorry. Or maybe want something from you too. Danessa
I have a 10 week old Yellow Lab pup, she is a doll. Only one problem so far. She bites. Just playing but it hurts. She has many toys lots of play time and lots of love. We have grandchildren and don't want her to hurt one of them. What should we do ???? Rita
Chantel,
As John R said Border Collies need LOTS of excercise, two one hour walks will not be enough. Maybe that's why you saw so many of them in shelters. People take them because they are smart and cute, but they have no idea how much work they are to be balanced.
Danessa,
I think dogs do it for different reasons. One of my dogs paws me when she wants something from me, or wants to alert me to something.
I appreciate all of your replies. I am still kind of at a loss as to what to do the next time some one comes over. Nightsun, you are right about the fact that the amount of swatting was light and probably wasn't as forceful as Cesar's mimic bites are. (My mom weighs about 92 lbs.) Also, John R. I was concerned about Beulah being fearful of the newspaper everytime I picked it up, but I have actually been reading it when she is around and shaking it (not at her) to get the creases out and she never moves. I don't know if it was because she was about to jump on my mother and the sound and paper startled her or what, but I still haven't decided what to do next time. The only problem with using the leash when some one comes over is that she doesn't wear a collar and the only time I put one on her is when we walk so she gets so excited about her walk I would hate to put it on her and not walk and just use it to correct her. As you can tell I am an undecided pack leader at the moment and I need to have a game plan next visitor. Let me say that I would NEVER hurt my dog.
Missy,
I wouldn't worry so much about the newspaper thing, as long as you don't use it a lot. One axiom of dog training is: "one good correction is more effective than nagging at the dog 100 times"
As for the collar, you need to dissociate it from the excitement of a walk...and means making her wear it OFTEN when she isn't going for a walk.
As for visitors, you must take control of their coming to your house. Make her learn to sit back while you open the door. If she gets excited and wants to jump on them, block her, claim the visitors as YOURS. Don't let them interact with her until she is calm and submissive.
Yep, this might interfere with your greeting to your guests...explain to them in advance what might happen. Make sure they understand they are not to talk to her, look at her, or touch her until YOU say it's OK.
I just found this site and the synchronicity of it makes me smile:) I have currently moved to the south and have been approached to manage an animal control facility. These shelters have a high kill ratio that I'm hoping to change.
I will take a look at inmate programs available a possible option for the dogs.
Thank you so much for your show!!!
The lives you touch allow others to learn and effect change as well..
Blessings and Light to you!!!
Hi Rita!
Puppy teeth will try your patience for sure. She is not being mean or vicious -- she is probably teething and "biting" soothes the pain in her mouth. You may want to try this ... if you see her biting, gently stop her and give her something that she is allowed to chew (continue this throughout her puppyhood and you'll never lose a shoe or a roll of toilet paper). There are several things you can use. What worked for us with our teething lab pup was freezing an old washcloth soaked in chicken broth. The cold will soothe her mouth. You can also buy "Chilly Bones," which are essentially the same thing (washcloth is cheaper)! Try a Puppy Kong, you can find them at PetCo or PetSmart, they're blue, as opposed to the red Kongs. Stuff it with a couple of puppy cookies and peanut butter -- not too much though, she may have a sensitive tummy. Orbee balls are also great. Planet Dog sells those and they're great b/c they're virtually indestructable. I had a lab/pit who was a chewer and he couldn't bite through them. Don't worry -- the puppy teeth will be gone soon!!! They're a KILLER!
As far as biting the grandkids, you need to set boundaries with her. I might suggest trying to get the pup to be calm/submissive before they go to pet her (easier than it looks, I know). Also, try this, if the puppy nips, say you, say OUCH loudly, then turn your back and ignore her for a few minutes. Pups yelp and stop play if one of them gets too rough. You may have to teach the kids that too. Our 8-month-old lab still nips every once in a while and when he does, especially if his teeth make contact with skin, playtime is over. It works for us, I know it may not work for everyone.
Also, make sure she's getting lots of exercise, not just lots of toys and love. I'm sure she has seemingly endless energy. She's still a little too young for long, long walks, but remember, a TIRED puppy is a well-behaved puppy. :) Cheers and good luck!!!
Chantal,
I completely agree about Border Collies being an active breed...almost too active. I have a few friends who own them. One lives on a farm and he THRIVES. However, another friend lives in down the street from me (I'm in a major city) and their BC had been through 3 other homes (this is his LAST, thankfully). The story was the same...cute puppy, too much for the people to handle. He energy is absolutely unbelievable. While he is a fantastic dog, he is the energizer bunny. I mean, seriously, 2 hours in the dog park continuously fetching, herding the dogs, etc...and he's ready for more. They are a TON of work. That said, they are also a considerable investment and you never know how much you'll be spending b/w vet visits, monthly heartworm treatments, flea and pest treatments, training, unexpected expenses. I'm not trying to discourage you, but I can tell you this...you WILL spend more than $300! :) Have you considered adopting a senior dog (7 years/older)? They tend to have less energy and from what I researched when we were looking for another dog is that a lot of the time, these dogs are given up because their families had to move or someone developed allergies? They tend to be fantastic family pets b/c they're so happy to have a nice home in a mid-to-late part of their lives. Check it out! :) GOOD LUCK
I'm a dog behind bars and have been sentenced to death by the Suisun City Police because they think I'm "dangerous," even though I have never nipped, bitten, scratched, attacked or in anyway harmed any person or animal. In my four years of life, I have managed to escape my backyard only twice. But because I like to chase people (it's a game to me), the police have decided I must die. By the way, I am an American Pit Bull Terrier. Do you think if I were a big yellow lab that I would have ended up on death row? Most think not. But we Pit Bulls are presumed guilty from birth, despite our good temperaments and sweet dispositions. If only the Suisun City Police would have let a dog behavior specialist evaluate me, I could have proven my goodness. But the police refused my mom's every attempt to have me properly and expertly evaluated.
I have been in lock-up now for 40 days at the Solano County Animal Shelter. I have had no visitors, no exercise and no affection in all this time, as the authorities refuse to let my mom visit me. My mom's attorney filed a stay of destruction at the court on April 20th, the day I was scheduled to be killed. My fate is now up to the Suisun City City Attorney, my mom's attorney...and YOU, the good-hearted dog-loving people of the Internet. Please visit my website to learn what you can do to help save my life.
MODERATOR'S NOTE: OUTSIDE LINK HAS BEEN DELETED. The policy of this blog requires us to delete any outside links or personal information.
I have noticed that other Canine Behaviorist people to label their methods as "POSITVE REINFORCEMENT training" on their personal websites are making a point to FLAME Cesar and his methods. One of these people happens to call him self the Original Dog Whisperer.
In my opinion, these people are very unhappy at the notoriety that Cesar is getting, and are jealous at his huge fan base. Their monthly incomes are most definately taking a hit I'll bet.
I have also noticed that people are using this blog/board for their own personal gain by posting puppy ads or animal shelter inmate info.
Come on people! Do the right thing. Follow the rules. Don't do stupid stuff to make them take this board down. It is a valuable resource of information for many of us!
Rita,
As the owner of a Yellow Lab-mix, I can't count the number of fellow Yellow Lab puppy owners who say their puppy
bites. I think it is indicative of the breed! None of
my other dogs has ever been a biter, but my Yellow sure
was! He eventually outgrew his "teething" -- I still have sweatshirts & pants that are as old as he is (6 years!) and are full of holes from his teething on my arms and
grabbing my butt in a nibble! He would nibble my arms like an ear of corn -- not good, but I didn't know that at the time. And sometimes he'd grab my butt if I was
walking past him -- not hard, just a little teensie nibble like he was playing. He still does a tiny
nibble here and there, if he wants my attention. (LOL all in FUN, I can assure you!! and it doesn't
hurt). I think what lj said is sound advice. Try to get
your dog something to teethe on, other than the humans in
your pack! We are lucky that our Yellow outgrew his
biting, and we now know that we shouldn't have encouraged
or allowed it in the first place. Re-direct his attention to something positive. That will do the trick.
KathyB, Like I said before, I'm jealous you have a walking partner LOL!!
How about having her dog come over to your house for brief visits before the honeymoon? Has her dog been inside your house before? Roman may behave differently if the dog is actually in his own house -- my dogs behave very differently in their own home than they do when they're outside. My stepdaughter and my neighbors can bring their dogs into our house and everything is fine, but there have been scuffles, particularly in the kitchen, where the food is! I would suggest bringing your friend and her dog into the house for starters for just a few minutes. Then extend those times for longer and longer. Eventually, have your friend leave for a little while and leave you there with the two dogs. After that, you leave the dogs in the house for a few minutes alone, etc. etc. Even do an overnight stay a few weeks before the wedding, or even a weekend if you can. And be sure to test the waters by feeding the dogs at the same time to see how they behave. Be careful! You never know how dogs will act when food is involved! When I had my Black Lab and my friend had her Belgian Shepherd, we always used to dog sit for one another. The two dogs were really great pals, and we were always at one anothers' houses, and we'd frequently leave the dogs in one of the houses without any humans, or sometimes one of us would go away for a weekend and the other would dog sit. Then, when we went on longer vacations, the other always dog-sat. In fact, she was the only friend I EVER trusted to dog sit. It always worked great because we were so comfortable with it. What the heck, give a few different things a try, and you'll know by the time the wedding happens whether or not you should take the dog during the honeymoon. (Oh, both of our dogs were spayed females, I forgot to say.)
Nightsun,
Thank you for the correction. I guess it does depend on how hard and in what state of mind if through "correcting" or "punishing".
Thanks to everyone who commented,
I am actually wanting a dog that I can run with. Obviously Border Collies are very energetic, and I'm not sure if I'd be able to tire one out, but they are so smart and good obediant dogs. I haven't really thought of getting a senior dog. I guess it's because...I don't know. I just want to have my dog for as long as he lives. I hate losing a pet. When my cat Salem died two years ago, I was so depressed. We had had him for over 6 years. He died in the morning before I went to school and it was terrible. I never cried but I was holding back tears all day. It's truly sad when you lose a pet, but now that I look back it was worth every minute. I'll still look into a senior dog though. They are usually less active.
But, anyway. I'm sure that any dog I get will be wonderful, and I'm sure that I will be able to give any dog enough excersise because I am bound to get in shape before I have to run the mile and a half in ninth grade this coming September. :D
~Chantel
Thanks to all for the info on our Gracie. The baby bitting yellow lab. We live on a farm and she gets to run outside alot. But she lives inside. We got her a Kong but it was red so we will go and get a blue one today. Freezing the rag sounds like great advice. It worked for our kids why not our dog ? Anyway thanks again and a million thanks to this site. My first try at a Blog. Rita
"In my opinion, these people are very unhappy at the notoriety that Cesar is getting, and are jealous at his huge fan base. Their monthly incomes are most definately taking a hit I’ll bet."
Jaemie,
You hit the nail on the head. Their checkbooks are taking a hit and rather than make room for Cesar in the world of dog behaviorists they're letting their greed stand in the way of more dogs being trained properly.
Cesar is unique as his approach is directed in a large way towards the dogs who have been labled agressive and are on their way to death row.
How many of these beahvorists have rescued the number of of dogs that Cesar has and then rehabed them and found them good homes?
Cesar makes it a point to say "his way" is not the only way and I've never heard him "flame" any other person in his business.
A dog's best hope is that NG will not give into the pressures being exerted now that Cesar has risen to the top and cancel his show.
He should be on tour via the media promoting his book, I was looking forward to seeing him do just that, yet his TV appearences keep getting canceled.
All true dog lovers would welcome Cesar's success because it equals the lives of dogs being spared as well as dogs getting to live balanced lives.
Hi Rita,
When I got my needle toothed 10-week-old pup, the breeder gave me this advice. When she grabs your hand with her mouth, stick your finger farther in and push down on the back of her tongue. This will be uncomfortable for her and she will struggle to get that nasty hand OUT of her mouth (and not put it in there again!) This method worked wonderfully! All the children can play with her without getting lacerated.
In the past with other peoples' teething puppies, I would try holding their muzzle closed briefly, saying no sharply, or sticking a chew toy in their mouth. None of these methods ever worked.
For getting at that chewing jones, frozen soup bones (also called marrow bones or beef shank bones) have worked very well for us.
Regarding positive-only methods:
I signed up for an "advanced" obedience class at Petsmart. At the first session I was told that I was "cheating" by giving a light tug downward on the leash when my dog didn't obey a "down" command (she was a bit leary of lying down next to all those strange dogs, many of whom were bouncing around.) I was told that Petsmart uses only positive reinforcement, i.e. food.
Well in this advanced class almost no one was even able to get their dog to sit. They kept waving treats over their heads and helplessly saying that the dogs weren't in the mood - even the guy with the chihuahua. The instructor would say, "I'll come back when he is ready."
Wow, I love my dogs and would never harm a hair on their furry little heads, but this is pathetic. THe dog only obeys you if he is in the mood for a treat? How can this be justified as training?
Positive reinforcement training is a fantasy. And the funny thing is, the people who use it are normally very ugly to those that don't. Where's their positive mind set when debateing the subject with others? they don't have one, and! most of them live their lives, ruled by their emotions.
John R
Actually it's not true that a dog will fear what it's corrected with. Not if the correction is fair, and the dog understands it. And not if the owner is not in a state of anger or frustration. When the apha uses his/her *teeth* to correct, you will see those same two dogs licking each other later. So where's the other dogs fear of it leaders teeth? All dogs have a healthy *fear* (known in human terms as respect) of pack members above them, and slight aggression (known in human terms as authority) to ones ranking below them. Like it are not, that's the way nature created them. A dog should only have *reasonable (heathy) fear* (be aware) of being corrected for doing the wrong thing. Not an unstable fear of who or what's correcting him/her. If that's not the case...then somethings wrong.
Missy,
Very interesting what a response you got from using a newspaper for correction! What I love about the show is that you can SEE the dog's and handler's behavior and reaction, which is not possible here! I am positive that in one episode that Cesar himself said something about some older people (don't let your mom see this, lol!) feeling more assertive with a rolled up newspaper in their hand when addressing a dog's behavior, which may be exactly what happened in your case. That is, the dog was responding more to your mom's energy than the correction (which certainly sounded mild). Cesar doesn't say you should hit your dogs (and neither do I) but as far as the dog becoming afraid of whatever they are corrected with, that's not the case unless EVERY time you pick it up they get hit. Cesar's dogs aren't afraid of his hands, are they? You will have guests that simply won't want to be armed with a newspaper anyway, lol, so the answer is to get the dog to the point where you are in control no matter what. If you can't use blocking behavior like Cesar (it takes lots of practice) or the dog won't obey a stay, then you will have to start out with a leash every time a visitor arrives. Just don't keep constant tension on the leash or the dog simply learns to wait for you to drop the leash before it pounces. Only let visitors reward calm behavior. It takes time, but with determination and commitment, you can do it.
k2,
THANK YOU for replying to my post!!!!!!
The ONLY concern I have is that the mastiff is NOT nuetered and I will NOT put my dog in a posistion where a fight will break out. If they do not have him nuetered by the time they are married I cannot or will not dog sit as that is asking for trouble (at least thats what my gut is telling me!lol)
Roman is male and he is 14 months old and has NEVER had the training he is getting now, for the first 11 months of his life, so I am cautious about putting myself in a situation where I have 2 male gladiator dogs and one may not be nuetered!...make sense??????
I have had my trainers dog here (in the back yard) and Roman is just a giant puppy!lololol He tried to mount the trainers dog (it was a female), and we put an IMMEDIATE stop to it!!! And any show of dominance from my dog, or any other dog at a dog park for example, gets corrected immediatly by me!....lololol....wether the owner likes it or not!
I am also curious as to why the breeder told them (my walking buddy) to wait until as close to a year as possible to nueter him as the more testosterone he gets, the more dominant he will try to behave (I have heard). The breeder told the owners that with this type of Mastiff, he needs to stay un-nuetuered as long as possible the first year....something about his bone density???????....any info on that would be SO APPRECIATED!!!!!!
"I am also curious as to why the breeder told them (my walking buddy) to wait until as close to a year as possible to nueter him as the more testosterone he gets, the more dominant he will try to behave (I have heard). "
That's not much of a reason...the testosterone levels start falling as soon as the dog is neutered. I prefer to wait until they are over a year for 2 reasons: I want them to look like males and I want to be ABSOLUTELY sure their growth plates have close and the bone has firmed up. I would think that is especially important for a large breed.
In my breed (Whippets) it has to do with growth patterns. It has been proven that dogs neutered young, and especially if they are neutered VERY young, grow up to be taller and narrower than they would if allowed to develop normally. In Whippets that can mean the difference between a dog that can compete in the many running sports - because it measure "in" to the heights required in the breed standard, or one that cannot compete because it is too tall and it measure "out"
Shouter, thanks for the response! Maybe I will add a chapter to Cesar's book and call it "Missy's Way" with the newspaper! LOL No really, I haven't used the paper and my mom hasn't been back to visit as she lives an hour away, so I guess I will wait for her next visit to see! I don't know if Beulah was feeling her energy or not ( she's not a dog person and I'm sure her energy was sheer frustration!!) I appreciate your reply!
Doggone/GA,
Thank you!!!!
I kind of confused the question with what "I" have heard...wives tale possibly of "the more testosterone he gets, the more dominant he will try to behave"
I know Roman being a German Rott was nuetered VERY young, so the possibility of him being the size of his sire of 180 is pretty slim then??? He has not really gained any weight since I have had him for the last 3 months, but my vet is VERY happy with his weight, so I'm not going to worry about it I guess.lol
Their breeder told them what you just said about the bones and stuff! Thanks again!!!!! :)
btw....I offered to dog sit for them when they go on their honey moon, but if he is not nuetered yet, I don't think it would be a good idea, as he will be a year old when his owners get married and my gut is telling me two male gladiators together and one being un-nuetered would be a bad combination!lol
I am bothered by the fact that some people do not understand why it is sooo important to spay and neuter. When a dog is neutered, you are not going against nature. Humans already went against nature by domesticating and creating dog breeds as is. Neutering and spaying is taking responsibility and providing a healthy, stress reduced life for a dog. An un-neutered male or un-spayed female can become unbalanced and frustrated when they cannot go and find a mate. When they do go and find a mate then they are creating more domestic type dogs who are not adapt at living in the streets, and they are either strays, or they are repeatedly brought to shelters where they can be euthanized, or even worse, they take away a chance that an older dog gets of being adopted. Any one who has a dog that is not fixed needs to give a try at volunteering at a rescue shelter near by. Unless you are a breeder, people need to stop making excuses as to why they are not fixing their dogs. It is sad when a dog lives for eight years, then he develops testicular cancer (common and painful for them)which at that point neuteruing is the only option. It is more traumatizing for an old dog to have to go through that later in life than it would have been for the surgery to be done as a puppy. It is the same as with a female who is unspayed. She can develop ovarian cancer. When you have your puppy spayed or neutered you are giving them a fresh start at a healthy life. There are so many reasons why it is necessary and in most cases these reasons are ruled out by personal preferences.
I am sorry if I offended any one, but I feel this is an important issue. I am tired of seeing emaciated stray dogs and cats worldwide, and tired of seeing old dogs with genital cancer that are in pain, I am tired of seeing drooling frustrated dogs that cannot release that energy. Fixing your pet is probably the biggest favor that you can do them.
Missy
You are missing the point. Cesar also talks about extentions of you. You should read al the post before passing judgement.
I'm sorry, I ment to say Shouter.
Sorry missy. :)
Think we are on the right track with Gracie now, thanks to all of you for your good advice. Pushing a finger in her mouth when she bites. Freezing the rag soaked in chicken broth for her to chew on. Thank You All SOOO very much. You have made our lives with our Gracie more fun.
Tianna,
I'm going to address some of the issues you have raised:
"I am bothered by the fact that some people do not understand why it is sooo important to spay and neuter."
It isn't as important as many would have you believe, *IF* you are prepared to manage your intact dogs properly...and that means, primarily, having GOOD fences. Mine are 6 feet high.
" When a dog is neutered, you are not going against nature. "
Well, yes, you are. Nature does not neuter non-breeding animals.
"Humans already went against nature by domesticating and creating dog breeds as is."
Not so. First of all, man did not create the genes that dogs were born with, they simply used what was there to their advantage. But, don't forget, it's to the dogs advantage also...they are enabled to survive when they might not have if not for the partnership of humans.
There are a lot of myths about the man/human genesis and the biggest one is that "man domesticated wolves." It isn't that easy to domesticate a wolf...just ask anyone who works with them. It is FAR more likely that for many, many generations weaker wolves who could not grab and maintain a territory of their own found they could survive by being "camp followers" of mankind and living off the "garbage" that man leaves around, or leaves behind if they are nomads.
After those many, many generations a "mutual" society developed whereby those now semi-domesticated wolves gained food and man learned that their follower packs could be useful as warning devices and even as assistants in hunting.
At that point the "designer" breeding of dogs developed those primitive animals into even more useful creatures that were worth the time and resources to bring them up IN the family and society, not just around it.
"Neutering and spaying is taking responsibility and providing a healthy, stress reduced life for a dog. An un-neutered male or un-spayed female can become unbalanced and frustrated when they cannot go and find a mate."
That is not true for the VAST majority of intact dogs. Just think about it: in a wild pack only the strongest, most dominant male and female get to breed. Believe it...the other pack members don't go all weird from frustration. They assist in raising the puppys and they still contribute to the pack's survival.
" When they do go and find a mate then they are creating more domestic type dogs who are not adapt at living in the streets, and they are either strays, or they are repeatedly brought to shelters where they can be euthanized, or even worse, they take away a chance that an older dog gets of being adopted."
You are making the assumption that EVERY intact dog will end up like this. And that simply does not fit with reality. I have had intact dogs all my life and NONE of them has ever been involved in producing an unwanted litter. Again, and always, it's in how you manage them.
" Any one who has a dog that is not fixed needs to give a try at volunteering at a rescue shelter near by."
Why? It's IRRESPONSIBLE owners of intact dogs that should do this, but THEY won't...because if they were responsible enough to manage their intact dogs properly there wouldn't be any need for shelters. I am a responsible owner of intact dogs...what would I learn at a shelter that I won't already know?
" Unless you are a breeder, people need to stop making excuses as to why they are not fixing their dogs. "
No, they don't. If they are managing them properly they owe no apologies to ANYONE.
"It is sad when a dog lives for eight years, then he develops testicular cancer (common and painful for them)which at that point neuteruing is the only option.
It is more traumatizing for an old dog to have to go through that later in life than it would have been for the surgery to be done as a puppy."
Neutering puppies is not as safe as you think, and neutering older dogs is not as dangerous as you think. I absolutely will NOT neuter a dog young. I think it's bad for them and for their PROPER development into healthy, normal dogs. And I have neutered dogs as old as 9 and they had no problems whatsoever.
" It is the same as with a female who is unspayed. She can develop ovarian cancer."
And if she is neutered young she can grow abnormally and never reach her full potential as a healthy, normal dog.
" When you have your puppy spayed or neutered you are giving them a fresh start at a healthy life. "
Not so healthy if they don't develop normally. Research has shown that puppies neutered very young have delayed closing of the growth plates and they grow up taller, narrower, and with "spindly" bones compare to their intact littermates.
"I am sorry if I offended any one, but I feel this is an important issue. I am tired of seeing emaciated stray dogs and cats worldwide, and tired of seeing old dogs with genital cancer that are in pain, I am tired of seeing drooling frustrated dogs that cannot release that energy. Fixing your pet is probably the biggest favor that you can do them. "
I only agree with this up to a point: IF a dog owner does not feel "up to" dealing with an intact animal, then BY ALL MEANS, yes, get your dog neutered or spayed (actually, "neutering" is the generic term - properly you get them either castrated or spayed). But you do NOT have to feel guilty if you don't AND you are prepared to manage them so they don't contribute to the unwanted pet problem.
I have had dogs for over 30 years, I've never had one with testicular cancer, have never had an unwanted litter and my current pack of 10 dogs - half neutered and half not - do not have problems with "frustration" due to not being able to breed. They are all healthy and normal, and the ones who are neutered were all neutered well after they turned 1 year old - several were neutered after they were 6 years old, and those had no problems at all with the operation or it's after-effects.
Tianna,
I have to agree with Doggone/GA. He has very valid points! If a dog is spayed or neutered too soon their over all health and developement can be adversely affected. Small breeds and large breeds develop at different rates. When I own large breeds I usually wait 2 years before neutering and until after the first heat before spaying. With smaller breeds the surgery can wait ubtil sometime between 8 months to a year for the males and after the first heat for the females.
It is important to realize that along with everything else, this type of surgery can have an adverse affect on the dog's urinary tract system if done too soon.
It is very possible to own intact dogs without them being dominate, aggressive, obnoxious and breeding at will.
Both of my dogs are "fixed". Both of my daughter's dogs are not. She works harder at being a responsible owner. I don't want to work that hard! (LOL)
Hey Rita,
That tongue pushing technique is really great isn't it? It's the only one that actually makes the dog think that she doesn't WANT your fingers in her mouth, instead of just thinking that YOU don't want them there.
I wouldn't give her a chicken broth soaked rag though. I would be worried that she would shred and consume the cloth. That's what my dog would do anyway. THis could lead to some serious vet bills! My pup keeps happy with plain unflavored rawhide flips (no chemicals) and frozen thick-walled soup bones from the butcher at the supermarket(she can eat the marrow but can't chip the bone.)
Those two items plus exercise really keep the teething under control.
Tianna,
Even though I see Doggone points, I agree with you. There are not too many people like Doggone, who is a very responsible dog owner with lots of knowledge. But I know that the average dog owner doesn't spend as much time, energy and effort to keep their dogs balanced and safe. I know many owners, who get their dog (or dogs) as cute puppies, and basicaly lock them in the backyard, never worrying about neutering (because the dog never goes anywhere). More than half of the dogs in my neighborhood I only see through the fence. And with males, I can say many are untouched. But they can escape.
I volunteer with animal rescue. Maybe that's why I so agree with you. Unless you are a very responsible owner, you definitely should neuter your dog, if only to prevent unwanted puppies.
"Unless you are a very responsible owner, you definitely should neuter your dog, if only to prevent unwanted puppies"
The REAL problem being, of course, that if owners are responsible there would be no need for shelters, but the irresponsible owners aren't getting the message anyway.
That's ONE reason I am so against any kind of breeding or neutering laws that penalize owners of intact dogs by RAISING such things as licensing fees for intact dogs...because irresponsible owners mostly don't pay the licensing fees anyway, they just get rid of the dogs if they are caught. And then get more when they think they are no longer being watched.
I have been working with dogs for some 25 years now. And I'm here to tell you, there are more irresponsible dog owners than responsible ones. The amount of shelters and rescue groups in this country proves that. That being said, every dog owner has the the right to make their own decision.
Doggone
You say you've had dogs for 30 years now, and have never had a problem. Well...good for you. But the fact is, most male dogs can be a problem when they smell a female in heat (which can be up to a mile away). *Most* male dogs will, and some can, try to escape their back yards. You being very vigilant in controlling your pack, is not the norm for most dog owners. Also,who knows, you could have dogs with a low drive, or it could even be a combination of both.
Owning dogs for years, doesn't give one the same picture as one who's been working with thousands of dogs for years. I see a very different picture. Perhaps someone can share a reason (other than breeding) to *NOT* get their dog fixed. To me, the only reason I can see, to NOT get a dog fixed, (which will never be bread) is ego. And how fair is it to a dog, to not fix them, not let them mate, but let them live with the frustration of wanting to. Because if one thinks their not frustrated, one is fooling themself.
Cesar certainly recommends and encourages people to neuter and spay.
On one episode he told the audience that a dog that is neutered isn't in the mindset of "I've got to mate, I've got to mate", thus giving the owner a much better opportunity to teach the dog balance.
It's totally irresponsible not to neuter and spay, and even worse not to recommend it to others.
The only exception to that would be for the truly responsible breeders.
Research the rates of unneutered male dogs developing prostate disease, you'll find that about 80% develope it and testicular tumors are the 2nd most common tumors in dogs. Neutering males reduces prostate disease and testicular cancer rates to near zero.
85% of of bites involve unneutered dogs.
Spayed females are 200x's less likeley to develope mammary cancer and pymoetra.
Male and female dogs in the wild may not get neutered and spayed, but they don't live as long as domesticated dogs do either.
And don't forget to look at the broader picture, i.e., 2.7 million dogs being put down each year.
Thank you Doggone!!! As the proud and OVERLY responsible leader of two intact males who are no longer puppies, I have been struggling with the question of whether or not to neuter them. They are always home, they never wander, even on the RARE occasion when they are let loose, and they are never aggressive. We've never had one fight between them. They are devoted to one another, and are very attached to each other and get along really, really well. My only problems with them is that they chase other animals, and are very powerful. One is 6 y/o the other 4 1/2 y/o. I don't think that neutering them will change their prey instinct or their powerfulness -- they are just big boys, and have a lot of energy. I have worried about testicular cancer, and it was really nice to hear that you've never had a dog w/testicular cancer in 30 years! I feel so much better having learned that from you.
I found it very helpful to know about the lower members of the back who do not breed -- that's all my boys are -- pack members who don't breed! You're right, in nature, dogs are not neutered or spayed. As I've mentioned before, the only reason I didn't neuter is because I've never had a problem with the dogs wandering or trying to find a mate or anything. They don't mount other dogs or people. They don't seem to be sexually frustrated. I keep them exercised and they both are very content and happy. The un-balanced-ness was happening with their chase/prey instincts. Perhaps this is a sign of sexual frustration. I don't know, but as long as I exercise them and keep absolute control over them they are not participating in the chase/prey stuff. My dogs are my #1 priority, since I have the time to devote to their care, so I'm very responsible -- almost to the point of being TOO responsible, like sometimes I just need to give it a rest! ha ha
Tianna, no you did not offend (me) with your post. I felt it was informative, and it really made me think!
I have a vet appointment in a two weeks from today, and I plan on talking to the vet about neutering them. I have talked with him about it in the past, and he has never pushed me to do it, leaving the decision up to me.
Um...I think we need to clear something up here. All wild male feral dogs will mate. As far as wild *wolves* goes, where the only two that mate are the male and female leaders. but one would be SADDLY mistaken to believe the other males do not wish to mate, BECAUSE THEY DO! It is the alpha male that stops them.
Also, just because one person has owned several dogs over thirty years, and has never had a dog W/tec-cancer, is not a clear picture of what the actual facts are.
I would still like for one person to give me a reason (other than ego) for not fixing their dog. If ego and breeding are the reason, perhaps I can be enlightened buy another reason. I'm always willing to learn something new.
So now I'm worried that I have done something bad to my 7-month old yellow lab. Was it wrong to neuter him at that age? Will it stunt his growth or adversely alter his health? I know people who neutered at 5 months. Our vet says that 7-mos was a good age to do it! He was never going to be bred (i'm of the "there's too many unwanted dogs camp" and I thought neutering was actually healthier for them. Very confused. Please advise!
lj,
If you trust your vet, I'd bow to his experience and knowledge.
He's seen and done the research and has much more expereience than anyone on a blog.
lj,
Btw, read post #90, you've spared your boy of prostate disease and testicular cancer.
"But the fact is, most male dogs can be a problem when they smell a female in heat (which can be up to a mile away). *Most* male dogs will, and some can, try to escape their back yards. You being very vigilant in controlling your pack, is not the norm for most dog owners. Also,who knows, you could have dogs with a low drive, or it could even be a combination of both. "
I have had intact German Shephers, Dalmatians, Whippets (mostly), mutts, Welsh Springer Spaniel - they can't ALL have had low drive. I have NEVER had a problem with my dogs getting loose. And Whippets, in particular, can't be accuse of low drive...one of the joking axioms of the Whippet world is: "if you want puppies, just breed a Whippet to something."
"Owning dogs for years, doesn’t give one the same picture as one who’s been working with thousands of dogs for years. I see a very different picture. Perhaps someone can share a reason (other than breeding) to *NOT* get their dog fixed."
How about, I don't want to? See, there's a difference between ADVISING someone to neuter their dogs...and FORCING them to. I don't have anything against neutering, I have 5 nuetered dogs myself. What I don't like, and what I resist, is the effor to make me feel GUILTY for having intact males. I refuse to take on the burden of guilt for the indiscretions of the BAD, uncaring, careless owners of the world.
" To me, the only reason I can see, to NOT get a dog fixed, (which will never be bread) is ego."
Now THAT's a highly charged accusation. To keep in it perspective, neutering is a dangerous, unnecessary operation that subjects the dog to possible infection and even death from the anesthesia. And there ARE countries in Europe that have made neutering ILLEGAL - except for health reasons. You can't do elective neutering in those countries anymore.
" And how fair is it to a dog, to not fix them, not let them mate, but let them live with the frustration of wanting to. Because if one thinks their not frustrated, one is fooling themself. "
If they are frustrated they are REALLY, REALLY good at hiding it. I thought dogs were incapable of deceit? Dogs do not suffer the sexual frustration that is so rampant among humans. All they have is energy. If you keep their energy levels normal they DO NOT feel frustration at not breeding. Yes, they may go a bit haywire if a bitch in season is close, but that's a RESPONSE to her condition...they DON'T sit around all day plotting on how to get some sex.
Dear lj,
Please stop beating yourself up over having your puppy neutered. Your Vet, Cesar and other enlightened folks have not and will not steer you wrong regarding this proceedure. As Sarah said you have spared your puppy from diseases that could very well shorten his life. You will now have a more calmer and stable friend to enjoy for a long period of time.
Congratulations on being a responsible pet owner and enjoy your happy, healthy puppy.
Now to something that speaks to the subject of spaying and neutering. While reading my daily newpaper last evening I came across the ads for people breeding and selling dogs. I WAS HORRIFIED!!!!
There were 95 individual ads for puppies and dogs people were trying to either sell or find homes for. If we have this many can you imagine how many there are throughout the country?
What are these people thinking. We have enough unwanted pets in our Shelters to fullfill anyone's dreams of having a pet. It makes me wonder how many of these "pure breeds" that people just have to have, wind up in our shelter's because they aren't exactly what owners wanted because they didn't take the time to research the breed that was best for them.
Health and behavior reasons aside, ALL out-going dogs (and cats) from pounds, shelters, rescues and breeders should be neutered just because so many are being put to death every year. If your purebred champion escapes and ends up being picked up by animal control, I think it should neutered before being returned (elderly animals or ones that are a big risk for surgery possibly being the only exception) to you. If it can get out once, it can do it again, and all the time it's out, it has the potential to mate. Here's my super unpopular belief about breeders, responsible or not: if you REALLY loved dogs, you wouldn't be bringing more of them into a world where so many are killed just for lack of homes. Even if every single pup in your litters has a crowd of people clamoring for it, without breeders, "responsible" or otherwise, to supply them, people would either not get a dog or would get a previously unwanted dog. At the very least, if breeders REALLY loved dogs, they would take in at least one homeless pet for every one they sold and also try to find that one a home (some breed rescues do this to some extent). I don't care about irresponsible owners, I care about their DOGS and the suffering they cause, and if we all take the "it's not my fault and I'm not part of the problem" view, there will never be any hope of solving the homeless pet problem... let the hate mail begin and the fur fly!!
Doggone,
Your opinions are that of most breeders I have talked to.
Personally, I am in favor of reducing the entire dog population, including purebreds.
I am 100% in favor of spaying or neutoring any dog that does not need to be bred, unless a vet advises against it for serious medical reasons.
If you will watch Cesar's DW episode with the Katrina dogs, you will hear a few of his opinions on this matter.
To discourage the readers of this blog from taking the responsability to insure their dogs don't produce "accidental" litters, is not something I would do.
But that's just my opinion, and I am not a breeder.
Deb
[quote]I have had intact German Shephers, Dalmatians, Whippets (mostly), mutts, Welsh Springer Spaniel - they can’t ALL have had low drive. I have NEVER had a problem with my dogs getting loose. And Whippets, in particular, can’t be accuse of low drive…one of the joking axioms of the Whippet world is: “if you want puppies, just breed a Whippet to something.”[/quote]
Why, why can't they all have low drive. Just how many dogs have you owned? Perhaps you just got lucky. I will say, that only you know your dogs energy level, I've never met them. But it is odd at best for an intact male, to NOT seek out a female who is in season.
[quote]How about, I don’t want to?[/quote]
Sorry, but that's a cop out. *All* of us have our *reasons* for doing or not doing something.
[quote]See, there’s a difference between ADVISING someone to neuter their dogs…and FORCING them to. I don’t have anything against neutering, I have 5 nuetered dogs myself. What I don’t like, and what I resist, is the effor to make me feel GUILTY for having intact males. I refuse to take on the burden of guilt for the indiscretions of the BAD, uncaring, careless owners of the world.[/quote]
I wouldn't dream of making you feel guilty, or try and force you to fix you dogs. For one thing, you sound like a responsinle dog owner. That you take a great deal of care to make sure you have well balanced dogs.
[quote]Now THAT’s a highly charged accusation. To keep in it perspective, neutering is a dangerous, unnecessary operation that subjects the dog to possible infection and even death from the anesthesia. And there ARE countries in Europe that have made neutering ILLEGAL - except for health reasons. You can’t do elective neutering in those countries anymore.[/quote]
I'm making no "accusations" (just look at your answer). Neutering is dangerous??? where are you stats backing that claim. Um...I've seen allot of ridiculous, stuff come out of "Europe", so I'll not be following their lead anytime soon. And so there...a dog owner is pretty much "forced" to keep their dogs intact. #1. It will be interesting to see the results of that law in about 10 years.
[quote]If they are frustrated they are REALLY, REALLY good at hiding it. I thought dogs were incapable of deceit? Dogs do not suffer the sexual frustration that is so rampant among humans. All they have is energy. If you keep their energy levels normal they DO NOT feel frustration at not breeding. Yes, they may go a bit haywire if a bitch in season is close, but that’s a RESPONSE to her condition…they DON’T sit around all day plotting on how to get some sex.[/quote]
Perhaps you just can't see their frustation. And it's not like they can explain it to you. ["Dogs do not suffer the sexual frustration that is so rampant among humans."] Again, what study are you going by? Also, If you read what I wrote you'll see, that I never stated, they ["sit around all day plotting on how to get some sex."] I specifically brought up their responce to a female in heat. And NO...the female doesn't have to come close to them, as I stated before, male dogs can detect (smell) a female in heat, up to a mile away. And finally, "you" the human... regardless of your "energy",have anything to do with how your dog feels about a bitch in heat. Sorry, but that's in their genetic make up.
Hey Shouter, I have adopted mixed breeds from shelters all my life and neutered every dog I ever owned. Still it seems extreme to say ALL breeders should cease having any litters at all. That would eliminate all the breeds. Do you think there is any sense to having a dog that is bred to be a water retriever or a herder or a tracker?
I think it might make enough of a difference if there were a crackdown on purely commercial outlets like puppy mills and pet stores that sell puppies in malls and such. People should have to go to a breeder or a shelter to get a dog. There's no reason puppies should be available for impulse purchase on the way from the shoe store to the burger palace.
I agree that every dog should be neutered before it is adopted out from a shelter!
"If your purebred champion escapes and ends up being picked up by animal control, I think it should neutered before being returned (elderly animals or ones that are a big risk for surgery possibly being the only exception) to you. If it can get out once, it can do it again, and all the time it’s out, it has the potential to mate"
And if that ever happens *I* for one would sue. What if my dog was stolen and turned loose? Or someone broke into my house and let him out? Or what if a tree fell on my fence and pulled it down? Why should my valuable dog be neutered willy nilly for an accident?
"Here’s my super unpopular belief about breeders, responsible or not: if you REALLY loved dogs, you wouldn’t be bringing more of them into a world where so many are killed just for lack of homes."
Here's where this kind of discussion always gets serious. What you are proposing would take breeding out of the hands of careful, caring breeders who work to improve their breed and put it into the hands of puppy mills, backyard breeders, and careless people who let their dogs roam and produce dozens of unwanted puppies. Be careful what you wish for, you might get it and have to live with the consequences.
"Even if every single pup in your litters has a crowd of people clamoring for it, without breeders, “responsible” or otherwise, to supply them, people would either not get a dog or would get a previously unwanted dog."
No necessarily, or not entirely. Take me for instance. I have Whippets because I love the breed, I want to always have Whippets. But, I am also involved in running sports for which Whippets were "designed" by their developers over 100 years ago: lure coursing and straight and over racing. If I was denied the opportunity to have Whippets because someone with the attitude you have made it IMPOSSIBLE for breeders to produce them, yes, I might still have a dog or two...but I would not have 10. So denying me my Whippets would not open up homes for 10 dogs, it would only open up a home for - MAYBE - 2 at the most.
" At the very least, if breeders REALLY loved dogs, they would take in at least one homeless pet for every one they sold and also try to find that one a home (some breed rescues do this to some extent). "
More than a few of them do. I don't happen to have one right now because I'm up to my max, but I have had them in the past...and I do have a couple that are "just" pets, that don't participate in my favorite sports for a couple of reasons.
"I don’t care about irresponsible owners, I care about their DOGS and the suffering they cause, and if we all take the “it’s not my fault and I’m not part of the problem” view, there will never be any hope of solving the homeless pet problem… let the hate mail begin and the fur fly!! "
There's no hate mail...just a caution: how will denying wonderful breeders and wonderful homes the opportunity to have the dogs THEY want cure the problem of BAD breeders and BAD owners? I see lots of message with your attitude, and I applaud your caring...but caring is not enough without WORKABLE answers. And villifying GOOD breeders and GOOD owners is not an answer, let alone THE answer.
"So now I’m worried that I have done something bad to my 7-month old yellow lab. Was it wrong to neuter him at that age?"
Don't give it a second thought. The problem with "early neutering" means VERY early neutering, like 8-10 weeks. At 7 months your puppy is pretty close to the end of his growthy cycle anyway. At most, he might end up a bit taller than he would have if you'd waited...but all bets are he'll be perfectly healthy and normal.
With the advances in laser surgery, neutering a dog is not a huge health risk. And to compare that surgery to the dangers and high rates of testicular tumors and the fact that 80% of unneutered male dogs develope prostate disease, it's obvious neturering is the best way to ensure good health in your dog compared to not neturering.
If one does not wish to neuter their dog, sobeit, however don't mistake the fact that the health risks are far higher for the unneutered dog.
[quote]And if that ever happens *I* for one would sue. What if my dog was stolen and turned loose? Or someone broke into my house and let him out? Or what if a tree fell on my fence and pulled it down? Why should my valuable dog be neutered willy nilly for an accident?[/quote]
Since you brought it up. How do we answer the question...of accidents. On one hand, we should expect people to be responsible and take *reasonable* steps to secure their animals. But just what exactly...is reasonable? If someone has a human or dog aggressive dog, and..."by accident" gets out and harms another human or dog, should the owner be responsible? After all, it was an accident that the dog escaped. IMO...yes, they should. They should have taken steps to account for "accidents". Like getting professional help for a dog that is known to have aggression issues.
So if someones *intact* dogs escapes by "accident" and mates with someone elses dog, who's responsible? Know one? Do we just say...oppsy!?
I find the question enteresting myself, as even I...am somewhat unclear as to the correct answer. First there's the "reasonable precautions", what's considered reasonable? And thens there's "accident". And after all, an accident is an accident, it's not an *on purpose.
Comments?
"With the advances in laser surgery, neutering a dog is not a huge health risk. And to compare that surgery to the dangers and high rates of testicular tumors and the fact that 80% of unneutered male dogs develope prostate disease, it’s obvious neturering is the best way to ensure good health in your dog compared to not neturering.
If one does not wish to neuter their dog, sobeit, however don’t mistake the fact that the health risks are far higher for the unneutered dog. "
This is the kind of statement that drives me nuts. If 80% of unneutered male dogs develop prostate problems why do *I* who has ONLY had male dogs for about 25 years NEVER had a dog with prostate problems? In fact, in all those years I've only had 1 dog with a hormone related problem for which neutering was advised. He had a benign anal tumor and was neutered at 10 years old. He lived to be 1 month shy of his 16th birthday and the tumor never got any bigger and cause him no problems at all.
"I am 100% in favor of spaying or neutoring any dog that does not need to be bred, unless a vet advises against it for serious medical reasons."
I don't have a problem with that statement. In fact, that's why I have 5 neutered males right now. But the "problem" is you don't always know at a young age which dogs are worth breeding and which are not. I have 2 that were neutered at about 15 months because both had 1 retained testicle...something you obviously don't want to breed for, and something that COULD be a health problem later. The other 3 I had neutered at around 5-6 years old because while they are very nice Whippets, they lack the quality of construction and performance that would make them valuable breeding animals.
On the other hand, I have a dog right now that is currently 13 years old and he sire his first litter at age 11. He, himself, has some conformation problems...but to offset that he has been an outstanding performer at running events and, in addition, his sire was an outstanding producer and HIs line is getting harder and harder to find "close up" in pedigrees.
So I do not neuter even young adults unless I am convinced, at that young age, that they are not going to be worth breeding. Sometimes it takes years to find out. I have a 10 year old dog right now that has only been bred once and he is still running and still competitve, even against much younger dogs. He has proven his worth by the titles he has earned.
"If someone has a human or dog aggressive dog, and…”by accident” gets out and harms another human or dog, should the owner be responsible?"
Certainly the owner should be responsible...just as if they kept a loaded gun in the house and it went off by accident...and they can do that...and hurt or killed someone. But your example, compared to mine, is apples against oranges. Any damages MY dogs might do are relatively harmless compared to what a KNOWN aggressive dog might do. Now, mind you, if my dog gets out and THEN attacks someone or another dog THEN from forever after *I* have an even greater responsibility because from that day forward I have KNOWN aggressive dog. Totally different scenario.
"So if someones *intact* dogs escapes by “accident” and mates with someone elses dog, who’s responsible? Know one? Do we just say…oppsy!?"
No, of course not. If it ever happened with one of MY dogs I would immediately have the bitch taken to a vet for an abortion shot. Just because a breeding took place is not reason that actual puppies have to be the result. I would even pay for the shot even if they couldn't prove it was my dog. It's not that expensive and I would bear the cost without complaint.
"I find the question enteresting myself, as even I…am somewhat unclear as to the correct answer. First there’s the “reasonable precautions”, what’s considered reasonable? And thens there’s “accident”. And after all, an accident is an accident, it’s not an *on purpose."
Lets see if my situation can make it clearer: I have 6 foot fences around my yards, because Whippets tend to be more likley to jump out than to dig out. That is, to me, a reasonable precaution against escape. But if a big tree comes down and takes down my fence and a dog or two escapes, that's an accident...but it is my responsiblity (as above) to bear the consequences AND to get that yard back to "reasonableness" as quickly as possible.
However, I *do* have 1 Whippet the will dig out if there is thunder or any similar loud noise happening...so the rule in my house is: if NO ONE is at home, Freckles is IN THE HOUSE. He only has problems if he's outside. In the house, he's cool and mellow no matter how noisy it is. That too, to me, is a reasonable precaution against his getting loose.
And, just to lighten the discussion a little bit, here's a story I read years ago and have always loved: It seems there were these people with an unspayed bitch and, darn, she got pregnant. They didn't know who the father was, but they were pretty caring people and they prepared for the big event as best they could. The mother had her puppies, and like all puppies they were cute and she took very good care of them. When they got to about 4 weeks old and were ready to start being weaned, one day there was a ring of their doorbell and when they went to answer it the neighbors male dog was sitting on their front porch beside a bag of dog food labeled "Child Support"
Nightsun wrote: "An accident is an accident, it's not an "on purpose."
Good Point.
After reading though the dog boards, and the many threads of "Oh help! My dog is pregnant by accident, it happened so fast...and, she's going to have puppies tomorrow! What do I do?!"
(At which moment some of the breeders on the board give the ignorant owner a real education on how they feel about the birth of "mutts", while at the same time they are popping a cork over their latest litter.)
This defonately seems to be an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, situation.
Spaying and neutoring is about improving the odds against those "accidents" from ever happening, and reducing the number of unwanted dogs, (including purebreds), which die in shelters ever day.
If you want to breed your dog, fine.
I just don't see discouraging the regular dog owner from doing their part to control the unwanted dog population, in order to help stop the deaths of millions of unwanted pets, to be the best advice.
"I just don’t see discouraging the regular dog owner from doing their part to control the unwanted dog population, in order to help stop the deaths of millions of unwanted pets, to be the best advice."
I don't know about any other discussions, but where, on THIS discussion have you seen ANYONE, including ME, *discouraging* someone from neutering their pets? I said, several times, that neutering is not necessary *IF* you are prepared to mange an intact dog properly. And I've said, if you ARE NOT then BY ALL MEANS get them neutered.
That is being practical, not discouraging.
And, as far as your experience with "After reading though the dog boards, and the many threads of “Oh help! My dog is pregnant by accident, it happened so fast…and, she’s going to have puppies tomorrow! What do I do?!”
(At which moment some of the breeders on the board give the ignorant owner a real education on how they feel about the birth of “mutts”, while at the same time they are popping a cork over their latest litter.)"
I don't see the issue. A good breeder plans a litter well in advance, sometimes years in advance. They care properly for the mother before, during, and after the birth of her much anticpated puppies. They raise the puppies carefully and well, and place them in good homes. Why shouldn't they "pop a cork" over their much WANTED litter?
The careless breeder on the other hand (and ANY owner of a bitch that has puppies is a BREEDER) had MANY options and chose not to pursue any of them: they could have had the bitch spayed as soon as they realized she was pregnant. If they saw the breeding happen, they could have had an abortion shot given or had her spayed immediately. If they decided they did want the puppies, for whatever reason, they had weeks and weeks to learn as much as they could so they could be prepared.
It's another apples and oranges comparison, as far as *I* am concerned.
A dog is a dog. Every dog which is born, adds to the dog population, and also to the statistics, period.
Yes you are right the dogs aren't afraid of Cesars arms/hands or a pack leaders teeth even though those are used for corrections.
What you are missing the point is that, those corrections they are doing AREN'T putting any pain on the dog.
My point was if you hit the dog with a newspaper and say cause a little pain, then you'll have a problem where the dog will flinch when you pick up the newspaper. If your dogs flinches when you pick it up, then the newspaper is seen as a negative.
Just like if you hit a dog to correct it and you cause pain , well guess what? Then next you try to pet the dog and it sees your hand coming towards it the dog WILL flinch, I gaurantee it.
So my point is don't cause any pain and everything should be alright. In the wild they don't have to use pain to teach one a lesson. Cesar doesn't use pain with his hands and the teeth of the alpha's aren't used for pain either.
I just think I didn't explain myself good enough.
"This is the kind of statement that drives me nuts. If 80% of unneutered male dogs develop prostate problems why do *I* who has ONLY had male dogs for about 25 years NEVER had a dog with prostate problems?"
You'll have to ask the researchers and statiticians.
Instead of being driven nuts, just be greatful. Because the facts are a neuterd male dog runs the lowest health risks of deveolping the above mentioned diseases.
"Instead of being driven nuts, just be greatful. Because the facts are a neuterd male dog runs the lowest health risks of deveolping the above mentioned diseases. "
That's not good enough. I want to know does management, feeding, exercise, stress levels, temperament, breed...thing like that have any effect on the incidence of prostate problems. I am on several Whippet mail lists and to the best of my memory, in the last 5 or 6 years NO ONE has ever requested information on prostate problems.
I couldn't find the 80% number you quoted, the only thing I could find on a very quick search was as study of Bernese Mountain dogs and in that study, of 109 breeding males they had just under 15% that had prostate problems.
"Just how many dogs have you owned? Perhaps you just got lucky. I will say, that only you know your dogs energy level, I’ve never met them. But it is odd at best for an intact male, to NOT seek out a female who is in season"
I've owned 25 dogs in 25 years. But you never heard ME say my dogs won't seek out a bitch in season, I said they don't sit around worrying about it. In a way I'm very lucky, I live in a county that ENFORCES it's "leash laws" and we have very few - almost NO - wandering dogs. Male dogs have to know a bitch in season is in the neighborhood before they get worked up about it, and in my neighborhood there are no wandering bitches around.
I did bring in a puppy bitch that was littermate to one of my dogs just for company for her brother once. They were both about 9 months old and wouldn't you know it, she came in season within 3 weeks of getting here - all that testosterone I guess! Anyway, the DAY I took her home was THE DAY that ALL the guys (and I had 9 intact males at that time) KNEW she was in season. Good timing!
"Sorry, but that’s a cop out. *All* of us have our *reasons* for doing or not doing something."
You could interpret it that way if you choose. I con't actually HAVE to have a reason YOU consider to be a better one. But there are other reasons that I also consider and I listed them in another answer: I like to give my young dogs a chance to prove themselves as pets, as performance animals, and as show dogs. When *I* decide they lack something that makes them less than satisfactory as breeding animals *I* choose whether to neuter them or not. It isn't something I rush into, and I tend to wait until my vet has a discount on neutering - which he does annually. But if they don't get done one year, I can do them the next...it's just not a big issue for me.
"Neutering is dangerous??? where are you stats backing that claim."
Ever had a dog die on the table during elective surgery? I'd call that dangerous. Remember, I have Whippets and like Greyhounds and Collies they can have problems coming out of anesthesia, or with going into hyper(something, can't remember the word) where they have a serious and damaging temperature spike. So I try to keep elective anesthesia to a minimum, though as you were about to point out it HAS gotten a lot safer recently, with new procedures, new protocols, and new anesthetics.
" Um…I’ve seen allot of ridiculous, stuff come out of “Europe”, so I’ll not be following their lead anytime soon. And so there…a dog owner is pretty much “forced” to keep their dogs intact. #1. It will be interesting to see the results of that law in about 10 years."
Well, Europe has different attitudes towards dogs in a lot of ways - for instance they are allowed in restaurants in a lot of places. So yes, it will be interesting.
"Perhaps you just can’t see their frustation."
Hmmm...I think not. Dogs that are frustrated can't hide it. They show SOME symptoms...they get frantic, or do repective actions, or they self-inflict wounds, or they have temperament problems. If they didn't, Cesar wouldn't have a job.
"Again, what study are you going by?"
Why does it have to be a study? I'm going by what I SEE here, at my home. Happy, healthy, normal dogs with no instances of frustration relieving behavior. What else do I need to see?
" Also, If you read what I wrote you’ll see, that I never stated, they [”sit around all day plotting on how to get some sex.”] I specifically brought up their responce to a female in heat."
And *I* never said my dogs don't respond to bitches in season. Some of them have been BRED, for heavens sake. Of COURSE they respond to a female in season...that's one of the MANY reason I don't have any bitches.
" And NO…the female doesn’t have to come close to them, as I stated before, male dogs can detect (smell) a female in heat, up to a mile away. And finally, “you” the human… regardless of your “energy”,have anything to do with how your dog feels about a bitch in heat. Sorry, but that’s in their genetic make up"
Did I say I did? All I said is my dogs are not exhibiting any signs of being frustrate because most of them are not bred, even though half of them are intact. If there were bitches around that came in season OF COURSE they would begin to exhibit more tense behavior...I'd be shocked if they didn't.
And what it all boils down to is what I said from the very start: if "you" don't feel capable of properly managing intact dogs, then BY ALL MEANS GET THEM NEUTERED. But my pack shows that dogs can be happy, healthy AND intact - PROPERLY MANAGED.
That is not a blanket condemnation of neutering - I have 5 neutered dogs, after all. Nor is it a blanket sanction for keeping dogs intact. It is an example that shows it can be done and that the dogs can remain sound, sane and happy. That's all it EVER was.
MODERATOR'S NOTE: OUTSIDE LINKS AND PERSONAL INFORMATION WILL BE DELETED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE MODERATOR. THANK YOU.
This link above has some very good points about health/ intact dogs, the proper age to alter a dog, ect.
Doggone-
I beleive that I have been mis-understood here. For those who have said, as you did too, it is rare to never that there are responsible owners that have un-altered dogs. I did not intend my speech as a personal attack, or a guilt trip for people who responsibly own un-altered dogs like yourself. I did intend my rant to be of no other purpose than to create awareness to those who have or know of any one with an un-altered dog. I am sure that you are responsible and provide a great life for your dogs.
Thank you to those who do agree with and understand where I am coming from on this issue. It is a wonderful releif to see that many people do understand it's importance. If it were not for people like you, there would be many more homeless pets, aside from the other issues.
"Thank you to those who do agree with and understand where I am coming from on this issue."
I'll tell you MY take on it: after living for many years in a county with NO leash law, and then moving to a county 18 years ago that has steadily gotten stricter about THEIR leash laws...I have come to hold the opinion that THE best law for preventing unwanted pregnancies in dogs is an ENFORCED LEASH LAW!
That still doesn't address the issue of wanted pregnancies by irresponsible breeders, but it's a START.
I am, as I'm sure you will have gathered, just a bit touchy on the subject of purebred dog breeders and the condemnation they come in for. I know SO MANY who are loving, caring, careful breeders who are INCENSED if one of their puppies gets "lost" because the owners simply couldn't be bothered to get in touch with the breeder when they could no longer keep the dog. That's how good bloodlines end up in puppy mills.
With all the best will in the world, NO breeder can be 100% certain that ALL their puppies are going to good homes...but they TRY their absolute very best.
It's lumping them together with "those other breeders" that gets my goat. The ones the breed just for money, or who are just careless and let their intact bitches get bred over and over and then dump the puppies.
But I would like to see more liberal system of free and low cost pet care for less fortunate people. There are LOTS of people out there who love dogs and can find the funds to keep them fed and well cared for, and even for shots and things like heartworm medicine, but who simply find it difficult to gather together the extra funds needed for neutering or for other more expensive vet costs.
I've been there where you live from paycheck to paycheck and you can JUST make your expenses, but there's nothing extra left over to save. I don't see why people like that couldn't be given a little exra help to get them over those occasional financial hills so they can keep their beloved pets.
What I just do not like is whole groups of diverse people being lumped together and then judged by the worst among them. As I've said in other posts, it's the good, caring breeder who are the easiest to find...they're at agility, or dog shows, or any one of a number of working events depending on their breed. They go to the vet regularly.
THEY are the ones that would be hurt by draconian breeding laws, which would do nothing to those "breeders in name only" who don't obey what laws there are NOW and who are careless with their animals, and who give away or dump litters instead of having the courage to, at the VERY least, have them humanely killed.
So limiting GOOD breeders in ways that won't affect the BAD ones just means that the good breeders will get fewer in number and their good dogs will get fewer in numbers, and the BAD breeders and the puppy mills WILL fill in the gap. Because you can trust this: they WILL fill it in. There will always be a demand for dogs and if dog lovers can't get them from good breeders, they'll get them from the bad ones. And yes, "getting them from bad breeders" includes getting them from shelters and rescue groups.
No, I don't have the answer to the shelter problem, except to say again: EVERY dog in a shelter HAD an owner and THOSE are the owners that are the problem, not the general run of pet owners. The question is: how to control them without ALSO hurting the rest of us. At this point in time, my best answer is: start with ENFORCED leash and confinement laws. Good owners and breeders ALREADY do that anyway, so you won't be hurting them...and maybe you can make an impact on the others.
In 18 years of living in this county I have only ONCE had to pick up a stray dog and, in that case, take it to the vet. Only ONCE. I think that speaks well for how well enforced our confinement laws are.
Doggone
Thanks for your responce. I would like to point out one little fact. You've had 25 dogs over 25 years. What's the percentage of that compared to...the number of dogs in America alone? Having 25 heathly intact male dogs, shouldn't be so...suprising.
[quote]John R.
Yes you are right the dogs aren’t afraid of Cesars arms/hands or a pack leaders teeth even though those are used for corrections.
What you are missing the point is that, those corrections they are doing AREN’T putting any pain on the dog.[quote]
LOL Your kidding right? I'm missing nothing my friend. Does Cesar Hurt or injure a dog? NO! Do some of the corrections he gives reach the dogs *ouch point* OF CORSE! If something makes *me* say, ouch! Did I feel pain? Most likely. does that mean I'm actually hurt? no.
[quote]My point was if you hit the dog with a newspaper and say cause a little pain, then you’ll have a problem where the dog will flinch when you pick up the newspaper. If your dogs flinches when you pick it up, then the newspaper is seen as a negative.[quote]
Actually...that's incorrect. It's all about the correction. Was the correction fair? Was the owner calm at the time of the correction? Is the only time a dog sees a news paper, is when it's being corrected with one. And...I'll ask you this! do you believe for a split second, that a swat of a news paper hurts even close to some of the leash corrections Cesar must give at times when dealing with a red zone case?
[quote]Just like if you hit a dog to correct it and you cause pain , well guess what? Then next you try to pet the dog and it sees your hand coming towards it the dog WILL flinch, I gaurantee it.
So my point is don’t cause any pain and everything should be alright. In the wild they don’t have to use pain to teach one a lesson. Cesar doesn’t use pain with his hands and the teeth of the alpha’s aren’t used for pain either.[quote]
Wow! Um, where do I even start here? While I don't hit dogs with my hands, I'll point this out yet again. But before I do, I have to ask, have you ever actually watched one single wild life program about dogs? Have you done any study of wild or domesticated dogs? Fact; Pack leaders at times are NOT gentile in their correction of wayward pack members. You can bet that some of the corrections they deal out are quite painful indeed.
And finally, let me ask you this. Do you think when you see Cesar put an aggressive dog down on it's side, and he talks about the pressure he is applying to their neck with his fingers...that those dog are *comfortable* at that moment? Or *uncomfortable*? Being uncomfortable, usually indicates...*some*...pain. Again, that doesn't mean their being injured or hurt.
I've worked with more dogs over twenty something years than I can count. I've given plenty of leash corrections, always stopping at the ouch factor, (becuase I don't feel the need to injure a dog to teach it.) I have yet to see a dog act afraid of the leash or it's collar.
Doggone-
I agree that leash laws are a big factor in preventing unwanted puppies. I agree that every owner needs to either keep their un-altered dogs from straying at all (which I am sure that you do) or they just need to get their dog fixed. I do know that many shelters will almost pay a person to have their dog or cat fixed. It is not that difficult to find. I do wish and think that spaying and neutering should be a free service that is paid for by the city for the sake of conrolling the stray population.
Also, if we never domesticated dogs by breeding, then we would still have wild dogs. Now dont try and tell me that a lhasa apso or whatever breed could survive alone on the streets, or in the wild. We did breed these dogs, and yes, it is not what would have happened if we never breed dogs. We would still have wild dogs. As humans, we created specific breed types to work for us, we bred them to be domestic, not wild, therefore, to have them fixed is not any more unnatural than it is to own a domesticated dog in the first place. Now, wolves belong in nature, not in peoples hands. If you ask what is the difference between wolves and dogs, the answer is what is the difference between lions and cats. Should wolves or lions ever be owned by humans? no. THAT is going against nature. Should wolves or lions be captured and neutered? NO. They are wild, rare, and protected.
Point and fact, there is nothing wrong with your situation, and the fact that you have a pack of neutered and un-neutered dogs that are well cared for, and not reproducing. They are all healthy, and that is just great to have. That is not a reality in many situations. It is respectable that you are responsible, and I do not think that all people who own un-altered dogs are irresponsible. That was a big misconception by you and only you. While the there are responsible owners like yourself, there is an outweighing number of people who aren't responsible, yet they continue to own more and more pets as the litters continue to arrive. Very sad.
Tianna
You are so right. There are far too many irresponsible owners out there and it is the dogs that are suffering because of it. And because of them, responsible good dog owners will be paying when Breed Specific Laws are passed! The list of breed specific laws include Labs, Yorkies, German Shepherds and all the Bull type dogs and mixes including Boxers and Boston Terriers!
If these laws are passed all of us will have a very sad future. Just think about the Service Dog owners and how their lives will be adversely affected!
Irresponible people should not own dogs, but how do we legislate that?!?!
Good Morning All!
They finally showed the bulldog & prison dogs last night and it was an AWESOME show!!!!!!
I LOVE that Cesar explained the claw and pressure point with his thumb....I'm sure the dog wasn't comfortable, but it's also good to see it working & for him to explain it!!!!!
Anyways....just wanted to say good morning and see how all my dog buds are!lol
KathyB
Your completely right, when he first placed the dog down and held it there, he talked about the force and pressure he was using. He will only lighten the pressure, once he can feel the dog relaxing. It is a HUGE mistake, for anyone to think that at times a correction, (depending on the dogs actions) shouldn't reach the dogs ouch factor. It's what they understand, and it's what they will, on occasion...do themselves. Nature created them that way, and we are not smarter than nature. To make a statement that dogs don't correct harshly at time with their teeth, is incorrect. And anyone believeing other wise should do some...research.
I finally got to watch the Pups on Parole and the Bulldog episode last night ,too.
If the Chow mix Cesar had pinned was uncomfortable that's OK. Cesar was bleeding after the bites! I think the degree of the correction should reflect the degree of the transgression. I saw nothing that was abusive only assertive. I must say Cesar was amazingly calm after he was biten and bleeding. He even continued his presentation with tissue stuffed up his nose to control the bleeding after being clawed by the dog.
Ultimately the dog knew who was in charge and subbmitted. I think it was wonderful to finish the nail clipping with a clamming massage for that dog.
I would not have been able to do that. I am so grateful for people like Cesar and the inmates who can rehabillitate dogs. Those dogs deserve another chance and those women deserve the opportunity to work with dogs.
"Thanks for your responce. I would like to point out one little fact. You’ve had 25 dogs over 25 years. What’s the percentage of that compared to…the number of dogs in America alone? Having 25 heathly intact male dogs, shouldn’t be so…suprising. "
It isn't surprising to ME...but it might be to whoever it was that said 80% of male dogs WILL get prostate problems. So *IF* that is a true figure (personally, I don't believe it) what are the odds that in 25 years and 25 dogs I've NEVER had one with prostate problems? If 80% of male dogs will get prostate problems I should have had *20* dogs with that problem!
"While the there are responsible owners like yourself, there is an outweighing number of people who aren’t responsible, yet they continue to own more and more pets as the litters continue to arrive. Very sad."
Of course it's sad. But MY point is that darconian breeding laws that adversely affect the GOOD breeders are NOT the answer. Nor are breed specific laws as they target good AND bad owners. The trick is to come up with laws that don't hurt the good breeders and owners, but can HELP stop the bad ones.
Are we ever going to get them all? No, we are not, but as a society we need to try to catch the bad ones without hurting the good ones. The question is how to do that.
Oops! I meant calming...excuse my typo please.
Doggone/GA
"Are we ever going to get them all? No, we are not, but as a society we need to try to catch the bad ones without hurting the good ones. The question is how to do that."
There are organizations out there trying to get a grass roots movement going to block breed spacific laws. Unfortunately I don't think that will happen. The list of breed types might be reduced and that is the best I think we can hope for.
It is because of the incidents like in San Francisco, the Cane Corsos killed a woman...the Pit Bull killed a 12y/o boy, that this legislation will be passed.
In the area I live the shelters are over flowing with Pit Bulls that will not fight. Good dogs, non-aggressive and obediant. But Pit Bulls strike fear in the hearts of the general public because of the sick-o's that are now breeding them to be fighters. And because people think it's cool to own a tough looking dog without researching the needs of the breed. And because people don't know their own limitations when it comes to picking a dog.
I own a lab and a collie mix because I know that I could never handle a Rottie, Pit, Boxer...etc. My dogs are also very low energy and mellow...they fit my ability to provide for their needs.
My father hates Greyhounds and Whippets because he views them as aggressive...a pack tore up and killed his toy fox terrier.
WE NEED OWNER/BREEDER SPECIFIC LAWS!
WE NEED THE EXISTING LAWS TO BE ENFORCED!
I think the bottom line here is money...it would cost too much to enforce these types of laws.
Most of our legislture and law enforcement are dealing with heavier problems....or what they like to call real crimes. Animal cruelty, neglect and irresponsible ownership is all low priority for them.
In the end the Good will be punished with the Bad.
"My father hates Greyhounds and Whippets because he views them as aggressive…a pack tore up and killed his toy fox terrier."
Yes, they CAN do that. They are hunting dogs that chase and catch their prey - they run it down. So anything small and fast moving MIGHT be a target for them. But on the other hand, terrier are hunting dogs too and THEY dig out their prey and kill it.
I had a co-worker years ago who had 2 Fox Terriers (not Toy Fox Terriers) and they bred them and kept one of the puppies. Not knowing anything then about Cesar's techniques (and actually he didn't either, he would have still been a child) but KNOWING the "work style" of Fox Terrier I did my best to get them to not keep that puppy.
But they did anyway and when it was about 3 months old it went into a hole under their air conditioner and the parents dug it out and killed it.
"Most of our legislture and law enforcement are dealing with heavier problems….or what they like to call real crimes. Animal cruelty, neglect and irresponsible ownership is all low priority for them"
That is SLOWLY changing though...because more and more studies are proving that people guilty of severe animal cruelty are quite likely to turn that aggression to people as well.
Doggone
I agree that there should be more low cost spaying/nuetering available, we have a mobile service run by a rescue group in our area that does an excellent job. I also am against any laws forcing owners to nueter their animals as this will only punish the responsible breeders and not solve the problem of unwanted puppies. We live in the country, on 14 acres, with no close neighbors, no stray dogs, and I thought I was a responsible dog owner. We had a female Doberman who never left our property and as I work at home, I was around all the time. She became pregant and we never even once saw the father. I thought it could never happen. She had 14 puppies. I was not able to find homes for all of them and taking them to the (no-kill) shelter was one of the most heartbreaking things I have ever had to do. I cried and cried. As I am not a breeder, I don't want ANY chance of this happening again and now have a female spayed puppy and 2 male neutered dogs. As I am not a breeder, I will never have unaltered dogs again.
I like Cesar's pointing out it's what we project, our "energy, and intent towards a dog, that makes all the difference, if we are sending a message to the dog via physical contact.
Pain and/or pleasure through physical contact, depends a lot on what the sender of the message is projecting. With humans, there is also the emotion being projected, as it can indicate instability if we are in a state of anger, frustration, or embarassment.
If we are projecting instability through our emotions, the dog may perceive the physical contact as an "attack", by an unstable leader, IMO.
I can give my dog a smack on the rear, and she loves it just as much as a good scratch. This is a "pleasurable" sensation, and she clearly enjoys it. If I smacked her rear with the same amount of force, in anger, this same sensation would be recieved as "pain".
Same level of sensation, different message being sent and recieved.
Dogs do use physical touch and bites to communicate with each other. However, I've never seen a one dog strike another with an object. When working with horses, a crop is also used as an extention of the human's arm, in order to communicate and give "cues" to the horse, not to "punish".
Cesar uses various forms of physical touch in addition to "the claw", such as a nip with his fingers to discipline a dog the way another dog would. He will also use a tap of his foot, to help snap a dog out of a frame of mind and redirect them.
I like the fact that he also moves past the moment, and on with the exercise, without obsessing about how everyone "feels".
Deb
Cesar’s Training saved our puppy’s life!!
I generally take my puppy out in the mornings, and my wife walks him in the afternoon. It was a rough start - the first few weeks, he balked, and would not be walked (he sat down). We took him to be trained, and last week, he’s passed the Canine Good Citizen Test. Now, he’s a model puppy - he sits at the door when he’s leashed, and waits for the command to go outside. There are many frustrated dogs in our neighborhood, and our walks raise a chourus of protests from the various frustrated dogs, both big and small. Sometimes, they escape their prisons to meet him, and he reacts with fear - not a good thing! Regardless, these walks have also erased his separation anxiety, and “cured” his chewing habit. For that alone, we have lots to thank Cesar.
Fast forward to this morning. I got up at 7am, dressed, and got started on our walk. I took the long way around. Our walks are now up to about 50-60 minutes in the morning, which at our heathly pace, is quite a bit for this little dog. We were in the last part of our walk, when my worst fear was realized - two big redzone dogs were loose, and waiting for someone to come by. One was the “American Staffshire Terrier” AKA the pit bull, and another was some other mixed breed dog that I did not recognize easily. My attention was focused on the pit, and on my puppy’s reaction. If he did what he normally did when two big dogs like this came up to him, this would have been a story in the newspaper about a man horribly mauled trying to save his puppy from being eaten. Last night was the episode with the incarcerated women and their dogs. One of them was a chihuahua, and Cesar was able to get this aggressive/fearful dog into the pack by picking him up by the scruff of the neck, and getting him to show the submissive posture. So, I grabbed my dog by the scruff of his neck, picked him up, and “shssed” the other two dogs. Confused, they backed off, and started walking behind me. I continued my walk, with those two behind me for quite a while. I then saw a neighbor, who I asked to call animal control. His presense, and my attitude of “King Lear” kept the stray dogs at bay, and they decided it was not worth a showdown with such a show of authority.
Nobody was harmed, but I was quite shaken, knowing how these dogs have seriously hurt others when they’re loose and have formed a wild pack. I finally was able to put my puppy back down on the ground, and we finished our walk as if nothing happened. He’s curled up beside me as I write this, blissfully unaware of the extreme danger he was in this morning.
Thank you Cesar!
Thank you MPH!
Poodle lover,
What a great story! Congratualations on being a great pack leader and applying Cesar's techniques!
Doggone/GA
Yes, I know! Whippets, Greyhounds...etc are all sight hounds and a small dog looks like something they should run down and kill. I know all dogs have it in them to be biters and killers. Heck, if a Lab is not properly trained he will never bring back the bird! Even Goldens can be aggressive. The point is this.....people don't usually research the breed or assess the dog or puppy before they take it home. They don't assess their ability to own a dog and provide for that dog's needs. They aren't like the owners on this blog site. They just see a dog/puppy that is cute and take it home.
Each time a movie is released, like 101 Dalmations..etc people go get that type of dog only to find they can't handle it. How many people would like to own a sweet loving dog like the one from Spanky and Our Gang? A Pit Bull...or the RCA Dog...or General Patton's dog...or even President Bush's Scottie? They will go get these dogs and never know what they are in for and not have a clue as to all the effort it takes to train the dogs.
Then we end up with Breed Specific Laws and all dogs suffer.
Phychologists have know for years that kids and adults who are cruel to animals are likely to become involved in heavy-duty crimes. THE CONSEQUENCES FOR ANY CRIME DON'T MATTER TO THESE TYPES OF PEOPLE.
My concern is that the changes needed to avoid Breed Specific Laws will be to slow, to late. Then people like me and you and the rest of the bloggers here will be faced with having to give up their dogs.
Heck...Labs and Yorkies are on that list....the list of dogs will surprise all of you...if the law is passed I will have to give up my Lab!
Thanks, Sarah. It's taken time for my wife to 'buy into' Cesar's techniques, but the "proof is in the pudding" so to speak. She had written it off to my normal type A personality, but over time, there has been a rather dramatic improvement in our puppy's behaviour. I'm just thankful that I had some clue as how to behave and what to do when approached by those loose dogs.
It's dogs like that that give the breed a bad name, and thus the law debate that's raging in this thread. I'm quite convinced if their original owners bothered to walk them hard enough to get their energy levels down, we wouldn't have to call Animal control, who would likely have them put down.
I'm that "someone" who said 80% of unneutered dogs develope prostrate disease.
Obviously I can't give links, but here's a copy and paste from just one such site:
MALES
Statistics prove that neutered males are healthier pets. Many diseases and health problems are caused by the effects of testosterone, a hormone produced in the testicles. By removing the source of testosterone, neutering reduces and eliminates the risks of many cancers and other hormone-related medical conditions. None of the behavioral or medical problems caused by testosterone are rare.
Neutering eliminates the chances of developing:
• Testicular tumors and cancer. Testicular cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in older intact male dogs. There are several types of tumors, both benign and malignant, that can arise within the testicles.
Neutering greatly decreases the chances of developing:
• Prostatic disease. Over 80% of all unneutered male dogs develop prostate disease.
• Infections and disorders of the prostate glands. Prostate conditions such as prostate enlargement, cysts, and infection are all related to the presence of testosterone.
• Perianal tumors—These are tumors whose growth is stimulated by testosterone these are commonly observed in older, unaltered dogs. Perianal gland cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in older intact male dogs.
• Serious types of hernias. These are commonly observed in older, unaltered dogs and can occur on either or both sides of the anus. One of the long-term effects of testosterone causes the group of muscles near the anus to weaken or atrophy. The surgery to repair hernia complications can range from $300 to $1500, depending on the severity.
• Infections and disorders of the prepuce (the outer covering of the penis).
To believe the stats or not doesn't change the fact that the health beneifits of neutering and spaying are real.
"It’s dogs like that that give the breed a bad name, and thus the law debate that’s raging in this thread. I’m quite convinced if their original owners bothered to walk them hard enough to get their energy levels down, we wouldn’t have to call Animal control, who would likely have them put down."
This is the primary reason I admire Cesar Millan and why he's my #1 dog hereo.
It's my fondest wish for all dogs that Cesar's philosophies being applied will continue to grow like a wild fire.
Imagine the world with dog owners who apply Cesar's techniques, the law debate wouldn't be necessary.
MODERATOR'S NOTE: SJS -- PLEASE DO NOT POST OUTSIDE LINKS.
Everybody interested in Breed Secific Lwas should read this....IS YOUR DOG LISTED HERE???????
What You Can Do:
HB189 was recently assigned to the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee and will be heard on Wednesday, May 4th at 8:30. Please contact the committee members below and urge them to support the repeal of Ohio's breed specific law and the opportunity to further develop a non-discriminatory, enforceable dangerous dog bill for the state. Your voice is especially important if your representative sits on the committee! To find out who represents you in the Ohio House of Representatives, visit:
(a) Legislative findings. -- The breed of dogs commonly known as pit bulls and other breeds of dogs have been selectively bred for the purpose of dog fighting. The characteristics selectively bred into or otherwise commonly found in pit bulls and some other dangerous breeds include:
1. A strong fighting instinct and a low level of fighting inhibition which make these breeds of dogs hazards to humans as well as to other animals.
2. A strong chase instinct which experts believe causes these breeds to be dangerous around children.
3. A tendency to attack even those persons that exhibit no provocative behavior.
4. A diminished tendency to bark, growl or otherwise warn their prey of an intent to attack.
5. A tendency to fight to the death and never quit a fight once engaged, which results in more severe injuries then those inflicted by other breeds.
6. The ability to withstand great pain, which makes it difficult for a person or animal to fight off a pit bull or other dangerous breeds during an attack or to prevent an attack.
7. Powerful jaws capable of crushing bones and hanging on to victims notwithstanding infliction of injury or pain to ward off an attack.
8. A tendency to tear flesh, which has resulted in grotesque injuries to human victims.
9. A combination of agility, stamina and strength, together with a genetic predisposition to aggressiveness, that makes pit bulls and other dangerous breeds uniquely dangerous, even to their owners, among all breeds of dogs, especially where improperly trained or raised.
There has been an alarming rate of attacks by pit bulls and other dangerous breeds against humans nationwide. Many jurisdictions have found that these breeds of dogs are so dangerous that special legislation restricting or prohibiting their ownership has been enacted. The General Assembly declares that pit bulls and other dangerous breeds, as determined by the Department of Agriculture, to be dangerous dogs per se.
(b) Determination of breeds. -- The pit bull, American pit bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one or more of these breeds or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the characteristics set forth in subsection (a) and for which justification exists based on the number and severity of attacks, as determined by the Department of Agriculture are dangerous dogs per se. This determinations of breeds, including those specifically enumerated in this subsection, shall be published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin at least once per year by the Department of Agriculture. (c) Special licenses. -- It shall be unlawful for any person to breed or possess any dog whose breed is listed or described in subsection (b) unless the person has a special license. A person who wishes to breed or trade any dangerous dog per se shall obtain a license in the same manner provided in Article II. A person who wishes to own or possess a dangerous dog per se shall obtain a license in the same manner as provided in Article II.
Dogs currently affected by BSL in the United States
This list is specifically named in ordinances
American Pit Bull Terrier
American Staffordshire Terrier
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
Bull Terrier (Monticello, Centerville, Alburnett & Hiawatha Iowa)
(Grandview MO) (N Little Rock, AR) (KY & WA)
Akita (Ulyssas, KS)
Alaskan Malamutes (Fairfield, IA)
American Bull Dog (North Little Rock, AR) (Aurora CO.)(Akron OH)
Belgian Malanois (Fairfield, IA)
Boerboels (Fairfield, IA)
Cane Corso (Aurora CO)
Chow Chow (Travelers Rest, SC), (Newport, RI) (Lynnville, TN)
Doberman Pincher (Fairfield, IA) (Sisston, SD), (Westfield, IL),
(Travelers Rest, SC) (Lynnville, TN) (Buffalo Center, IA)
Dogo Argentino (Aurora CO)
English Mastiffs, (Yale, IA)
Fila Brasileiro (also known as the Fila, Brazilian Mastiff) (Aurora
CO)
German Shepard (Fairfield, IA) (Lynnville, TN)
Great Danes (Fairfield, IA)
Irish Wolf Hounds (Fairfield, IA)
Mastiffs (Fairfield, IA)
Malamutes (Fairfield, IA)
Presa Mallorquin (also known as the Ca De Bou) (Aurora, CO)
Presa Canario (Lanett, AL) (Aurora CO)
Rottweiler (North Little Rock AR) (Buffalo Grove, ILL) (Fairfield,
Conrad, Lake Mills & Lockridge IA) (Walkerton, IN) (Inman, KS) (Carl
Junction & Salisbury MO) (Binghamton, NY) (Velva, ND)(Pawtuckett, RI)
(Travelers Rest, SC)(Lynnville, TN)(Smithville, UT)(Neah Bay, WA)
(Buffalo Center, IA)
Scottish Deerhounds (Fairfield, IA)
Shar Pei's (Smithfield, UT)
Siberian Huskies (Fairfield, IA)
Tosa Inu (Aurora CO)
NOTE These are breeds that are typically over 100 lbs according to
UKC & AKC Standards. If your dog is over 100lbs in Fairfield, Iowa it
is considered a restricted breed.
Italy - has just introduced tough new laws targeting 'potentially aggressive' breeds, but has steered clear of out and out breed specific bans. However, the new laws are flawed, branding breeds such as Border Collies and Corgis as 'dangerous'.
Ireland - Leash and muzzle laws apply to the American Pit Bull Terrier, Bulldog, Bull Mastiff, Dobermann Pinscher, Bull Terrier, German Shepherd (Alsatian), Japanese Akita, Japanese Tosa, Rhodesian Ridgeback, Rottweiler and Staffordshire Bull Terrier and crosses of these breeds.
AIREDALE TERRIER * AKITA * ALASKAN MALAMUTE * ALSATIAN SHEPHERD * AMERICAN BULLDOG * AMERICAN HUSKY * AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER * AMERICAN STAFFORDSHIRE TERRIER * AMERICAN WOLFDOG * ARIKARA DOG * AUSTRALIAN CATTLE DOG * AUSTRALIAN SHEPHERD * BELGIAN MALINOIS * BELGIAN SHEEPDOG * BELGIAN TERVUREN * BLUE HEELER * BOSTON TERRIER * BOUVIER DES FLANDRES * BOXER * BULLDOG * BULL MASTIFF * BULL TERRIER * CANE CORSO * CATAHOULA LEOPARD DOG * CAUCASIAN SHEPHERD * CHINESE SHAR PEI * CHOW-CHOW * COLORADO DOG * DOBERMAN PINSCHER * DOGO DE ARGENTINO * DOGUE DE BORDEAUX * ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIEL * ESKIMO DOG * FILA BRASILERO * FOX TERRIER * FRENCH BULLDOG * GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG * GOLDEN RETRIEVER * GREENLAND HUSKY * GREAT DANE * KEESHOND * KOTEZEBUE HUSKY * LABRADOR RETRIEVER * MASTIFF * PRESA DE CANARIO * PUG * ROTTWEILER * SAARLOOS WOLFHOND * SAINT BERNARD * SAMOYED * SIBERIAN HUSKY * STAFFORDSHIRE BULL TERRIER * TIMBER SHEPHERD * TOSA INU * TUNDRA SHEPHERD * WOLF SPITZ *
Animal ownership and use is under attack in the USA as never before in its history. All practitioners of animal husbandry are in jeopardy. We take on the challenge of protecting all animal ownership and use. From fighting breed specific legislation to NAIS, and beyond. We must save our great pet/animal/agriculture industry. Cats are named in vicious animal laws. Dogs are prohibited by breed. Breed Specific Dog Laws have no stopgaps to prevent the addition of all dogs. They set legal precedent that could ostensibly allow the addition of all domestic species of animals. We recognize that we must stand together as one. We support Responsible Ownership Laws. We will let these breeds stand as a monument to the truth. Banned or restricted breeds, plus any mixed breed that contains as an element of it's make-up any of these breeds;
Airedale Terrier - Akita - Alaskan Malamute -Alsatian Shepherd -American Bulldog - American Husky - American Pit Bull Terrier - American Staffordshire Terrier - American Wolfdog - Arikara Dog - Australian Cattle Dog - Australian Shepherd
Belgian Malinois - Belgian Sheepdog - Belgian Tervuren - Blue Heeler - Boston Terrier - Bouvier Des Flandres - Boxer - Bulldog - Bull Mastiff - Bull Terrier
Cane Corso - Catahoula Leopard Dog - Caucasian Shepherd - Chinese Shar Pei - Chow Chow - Colorado Dog
Doberman Pinscher - Dogo De Argentino - Dogue De Bordeaux -
English Springer Spaniel - Eskimo Dog
Fila Brasiliero - Fox Terrier -French Bulldog
German Shepherd Dog - Golden Retriever - Greenland Husky - Great Dane
Keeshond - Kotezebue Husky
Labrador Retriever
Mastiff
Presa De Canario - Pug
Rottweiler
Saarloos Wolfhond - St. Bernard - Samoyed - Siberian Husky - Staffordshire Bull Terrier -
Timber Shepherd - Tosa Inu - Tundra Shepherd
Wolf Spitz.
I'm wondering what part of "do not post links" people don't understand?
I hope NG will not have to shut down this blog because people don't take the time to read the rules of this blog, or choose to ignore them.
MODERATOR'S NOTE: ALL outside links will be deleted.
Sorry Sarah.
I just thought the link was very important to ALL dog owners who may not know who to contact to let their voices be heard. It will be very sad if the legislation is passed.
SJS,
I understand the importance of your post and I agree it will be very sad if the legislation passes.
My only concern is after awhile NG will shut down the blog if people don't adhere to the rules and then less dog owners will be able to learn the importance of how to handle thier dogs properly.
The link will be deleted, so I hope you're able to find another well read site to post it where it will remain and do the good you wish it accomplish.
Sarah,
I do support and believe in Cesar's mission to rehabilitate dogs and train people. I do believe in this blog as a place to discuss Cesar's way.
I also believe that no breed of dog can be considered safe as long as legislation is pending to ban them. This legislation includs any dog that is a MIXED breed of any of the specific breeds mentioned. MUTTS WILL NOT BE SAFE.
THIS TYPE OF LEGISLATION COULD END DOG REHABILITATION.
I'M OUT OF HERE!
I have always loved the ideas of dogs in prison. They have so much love to give and are unconditional. It is something most prisoners are not familiar with. I was introduced to a program in Indianapolis at the Woman's prison. The women train dogs to be service dogs. It does a lof for their self esteem and their eventual rehabilitation. I am encouraged to see another program that involves dogs who also have been outcast.
Sarah,
I'm with you on this. Everytime this blog takes a "political" swing, or gets too far off topic with emotional personal debates, I get a little concerned.
Yes, these are all important and passionate topics. But, this blog is a gift, where we can come to discuss Cesar's philosophies and methods, and share personal stories, information, and experiences, with other people who also support and use Cesar's methods.
If I want a debate, there are tons of dog boards out there I can go to, and address all of these important topics. Anything from puppymills to animal testing, can be discussed in those forums.
This is only my personal opinion, I am not trying to start a debate. :)
Deb
"Then people like me and you and the rest of the bloggers here will be faced with having to give up their dogs."
And it's sad, but it's sort of a part of the problem...on any blog like this, or email list, etc. you preaching to the choir. It's the people who AREN'T motivated enough to reach out to others like that that are the ones that cause the problems!
"To believe the stats or not doesn’t change the fact that the health beneifits of neutering and spaying are real. "
Certainly they are real...and so are some of the health problems CAUSED by neutering, such as bitches that "leak" urine and are cured by reintroduction of female hormones.
And you are quite right. I do not believe the numbers quoted. Of all the list of male dog problems that can occur if the dog is not neutered, I have only had to deal with *1* of them in 25 years. I had 1 dog that developed an perianal tumor and yes, he was immediately neutered, and the tumor stopped growing. He live to be nearly 16 years old.
And no apologies for being as sceptic, but if that 80% for prostate problems is true I should have had 20 out of 25 dogs with prostate problems and in 25 years I have had NONE.
So, being a human being, and as most humans do, tending to trust my own experience I will continue to decide for MYSELF when and whether my dogs should be neutered. If I ever experience that 80% prostate problem level...I'll let you know.
Wow, all this stuff about neutering or not! Whew, I'm exhausted reading it all! However, I still feel very good about not having neutered my boys (yet) at ages 6 & 4. My town has a leash law, and I'm one of the FEW people who actually obeys the law. Most of the dogs in my neighborhood are loose, however, many stay in their yards. It also just so happens that all the dogs in my area are neutered males, with the exception of about two or three fixed females (only two or three) and that's within the first two miles of my home. There are no females in heat for my dogs to seek out, so they stay home, if, and that's a big IF... IF they are loose, which they practically never are. So, mine is not an ego-driven reason for not neutering (I'm a woman, after all so I don't need to have a "macho" reason -- how 'bout just no reason at all... it just never seemed to be necessary) I suppose one could call it "laziness" but ask anyone who knows me I'd not normally be described as "lazy"-- far from it. I am very pleased to see what Doggone has had to say over these past few postings, as it's underscored that the decision to neuter or not is mine to make on behalf of my beloved hounds. Oh, my town not only has a leash law that is enforced, but they also charge us non-neutering dog owners more money for our annual licensing. It's only a couple of dollars more than it would be if they were neutered.
Doggone,
I don't recall anyone asking for any apologies, believe what you want.
I'll stick with the scientific data..you're certainly free to do otherwise.
HELP!lol I need some guidance or adivce please!!!!
My new friend and Roman's new friend are having a BLAST walking the dogs but it seems we are running into a "snag"....Roman & Hoss officially met on the last walk (a day or two ago) and got to play....and man o man did they!lol
Today when I met them to go on our walk, Roman would NOT behave as normal and kept just wanting to "get to" Hoss to play. We ended up at my house in the back yard, we let them off their leashes and Roman just would NOT let up and wanted to play and play and play...to the point I had to leash him and make him stay away from Hoss for a few minutes, so Hoss could sniff and get a drink of water. Then of course when Hoss was ready to play again I let Roman off leassh and there they went again!lol
My question.....since Brit & I are having so much fun walking our dogs together, what can I do to get Roman to concentrate on ME & walking and not on his new "buddy" and also, when we let them play....should we just get a couple lawn chairs and let the boys play until they are "done/wiped out"????? How do I get Roman to stop when I want him to stop?
This is really hard to explain on a blog!lololol
KathyB,
This was not hard to predict. Many folks get lax after an initial exercise, and things become out of control.
Cesar's techniques must be practiced on a constant basis, and the dogs are only allowed "free time" when they've earned it, at the end of the walk, IF they have behaved during the walk, and only for brief periods. And, not on every single walk.
There should be some walks, which the dogs do not interact at all, and only practice calmly following their leaders.
Not much fun for the humans sometimes, but this is in the dog's best interests
I recommend getting back to Cesar "basics", and not letting the dogs interact for the next few walks.
Deb
Good Morning Debbie RBW,
Thank You for your input!!!! :)
This has only been our 3rd walk.
The first went great, the second pretty good for Roman, so so for Hoss, yesterday wasn't good!lol
The second walk is when they have met so yesterday was their third walk. And Roman was completely bad...just wanting to get to his "buddy"...how do I correct that?
Getting back to the basics will be easy for me, so thats not going to be hard, but what do I do when they do get free time and I have the crazy playing dogs???? Do we just let them and have a seat or what????lololol
Hi KathyB,
I think I would have both you and your friend approach the walk as a serious "leadership" exercise, and as a way to get the dogs energy level down. Walking briskly and the addition of a backpack, (for your dog, ha-ha), will help.
Avoid anything which increases the dog's excitement level, including happy talk about "Let's go see your buddy!". Head out to meet your friend, and join up calmly, and move together in the same direction. Move like you have a purpose. Remember how Cesar uses his body posture, attitude, and energy to project who he is and what he wants from a dog, as their leader.
After you are a half an hour into the walk, give the dogs a relaxed break, where they are allowed to interact a bit, but use a boundary word, just enough tug on the leash, to redirect the dogs, and calmly head off again, if your dog starts even thinking about getting excited. Remember, this is a serious exercise, no goofing off.
Practice taking these short breaks along the way, and allow the dogs short moments to interact, as long as they stay in "on the job mode". Then move off again.
Practice stopping and not letting them interact, but make them sit and ignore each other, while you and your friend stop and chat.
Using the walk this way will help you learn to keep control of your dog, and his focus on you in other situations, too. You want your dog to be under your control and paying attention to you, anytime he even sees another dog. So, this will be a big help towards handling your dog in general.
I'm not there to see how the dogs are interacting when they play, but your dog sounds like he may be being very pushy with the other dog. As leader, you must let him know this overly excited behavior is not wanted by you.
Practice the walk with no play sessions at the end for a couple of days, then allow them to play some at the end of the session on the third day, as long as your dog doesn't get pushy with the other dog and both dogs have remained calm/submisive throughout the entire walk that day.
Without being there to see how your dog is "playing" with the other dog. This is about the best I can do online!
I'm glad you have a friend to practice leadership skills and the walk. I think the buddy system is great and wish more people would do this, too.
Of course it helps if both of you are watching the DW shows, so you are both on the same page!
I hope this helps.
Deb
Thanks Deb!
Here is a little backround on the two dogs...Roman (mine) is a 14 month old nuetered male German Rottweiler at 98lbs. and Hoss is an 8 month old male un-nuetered Mastiff at about 98lbs.
They are about the same size and weight and it looks like when they play, they are two wrestlers gaining position. They are both big, strong dogs but Roman does "push on him"....there is alot of that going on with both of them, but after watching them for about 20 minutes it became two puppys playing/wrestling/rolling around, etc. with no jockeying for position.
I think maybe we should both just focus on walking with each other and the dogs not getting a chance to "play" or "meet" as Roman is not listening and is more focused on wanting to play with his buddy than anything else????? Your thoughts?????
Another interesting thing.....he has NEVER played with another dog like this at the dog park....he tried with my trainers dog to do what he is doing (at my house) to Hoss but she is only 50lbs., and that was unacceptable to both me & the trainer.
Also (sorry!lololol) the first time Hoss and Roman got to play was on Hoss's turf and this last time was on Roman's turf (turf being back yard) and the play and stuff was exactly the same.
KathyB,
Yes, focus on the walk and follow my instructions in the above posts. Read them through again, and try to stick to what I've recommended.
These guys are young, of course they want to play and interact. It's good for them. Just make sure you are listened to and respected anytime you ask them to settle down, and break it off.
Deb :)
Thanks Deb!
I printed out the topic and I also copied the conversation and forwarded it to my walking buddie, so we are both on the same page and we both agree, which we do!!
Thanks again! And if you have anymore pointers or anything I'm ALL ears! :)
Great KathyB,
The only other thing which I've noticed is regarding certain dogs, and dog parks.
Sometimes, if a dog doesn't get to walk with other dogs, in structured "leadership" walks, and only interacts with other dogs when they go to a dog park or in play sessions, they can get frustrated at the sight of other dogs.
With some dogs, it's like they become "conditioned" to become excited, because anytime they see another dog, they think it's a "playtime" free-for-all. This can lead to frustration while on leash, that can eventually become dog aggression, IMO and experience.
Cesar did a segment on dog parks, and I believe he mentioned he always walks his dogs before allowing them to interact at a park.
Remember to stand tall and keep your eyes ahead, and off of your dog as best you can during the walk. Your dog should be paying attention to what you are doing, not the other way around. Doing turns and changing direction, is also helpful in keeping your dog's attention on you.
Give your friend a hug for working with you to help your dogs become calm/submissive pack members, and the two of you calm/assertive Pack Leaders! :)
Deb
Thanks Deb!
Roman does AWESOME at the dog park (he's been twice) and behaves beautifully!!! And our walks are always perfect lately....it's adding a walking partner into the mix that has hit a snag. Roman even did awesome on our first walk with Hoss....it wasn't until they had an official "meet & play" did things turn different & Roman became difficult.
We are going to get back on track & back on a strict walk (like before I had a walking buddy) but with our walking buddy. It became frustrating yesterday to have Roman act up like he did and not pay attention, so I may tell Brit that today I am going to walk Roman alone to get him back on track and we will start back up tomorrow...is that a good idea???? I ordered a back pack too btw!!!!! :)
To all those posting comments, DO NOT POST OUTSIDE LINKS. They will be deleted.
I made an observation today when my dogs met up with their pal, Bailey, who lives across the street from us. The three dogs all grew up together and are 4, 5 & 6 years old. They all get along great. Bailey has a habit of "growling" when he meets up with my guys, but nothing ever happens, it's just a weird quirk, and they all respect each other. Bailey is always loose, my guys are always on leash -- sometimes Hector is off leash, but not recently. Anyway, I noticed that they greeted each other HEAD-ON. I know I have read in Cesar's book, as well as in other places non-Cesar, and on the DW show, etc., that dogs DON'T greet each other head-on, but I made a point of observing them today since we'd been away for a couple of days, and I couldn't believe it, they walked right up to each other making full-on eye contact. Perhaps it's because they all know each other so well. Maybe the stuff I read/saw was about dogs who don't know each other ???
K2,
Maybe it has to do with this face to face position, being the most likely to become confrontational, because it requires a dog to make a decision. Leaders make decisions, followers go along with the decisions made by the leaders. Leaders are in front of followers, so the followers can see them.
Part of this may be due to what we create as humans, when we project human psychology into dog interactions.
Remember, they have their own forms of communication and methods of figuring out "who is who" and "where do I fit within this group?".
Dogs don't walk up, shake hands, and then decide the person they just shook hands with is okay, or not okay based on what they then reveal about their character during the insuing conversation.
IMO, with a dog, pack positioning and the sorting out of status, happens within seconds. I've heard Cesar say this takes less then 10 seconds, for a dog.
This is why the parallel position, which we initiate as the Pack Leader, takes the decision away from the dog, establishes our leadership position, and by moving together in the same direction, helps reduce conflict because we have joined up as a pack, and are now co-operating.
This might sound complicated, but a dog's world is so simple. It's all leader and follower, decision and compliance, and action and reaction.
Debbie,
you wrote: "This is why the parallel position, which we initiate as the Pack Leader, takes the decision away from the dog, establishes our leadership position, and by moving together in the same direction, helps reduce conflict because we have joined up as a pack, and are now co-operating."
I personally think that this is why, when I grabbed my poodle by the scruff and kept on walking, the pit bull and his accomplice did not attack us - I took the leadership position, and did not allow him time to think about it. I was the leader, and he was going to follow me. That's exactly what happened!
Without this knowledge, things would have gotten very bad for my dog with the pit, as he tends to show fear when larger dogs approach him.
GRRR, I am SO frustrated! Doggone, Debbie RBW, Nightsun, K2, does any one out there have advice for me?
I just got back from a beautiful hike in the hills where for the 3rd time this week my 2 dogs took off on me for over 10 minutes.
They are so respectful in all other ways. THey walk beautifully on lead, don't jump on people, go thru doors and gates after me, drop bones on command, hold nice stays even with lots of distractions... I feel like I'm doing everything right, but this is just not working!
The friends I hike with have lovely but UNTRAINED dogs. They jump on people, pull on their leashes, etc, BUT on the trail they just galumph along and never run away!
My 2 dogs always ranged more widely, (I thought Hey they're in good shape!) but now they are going farther and farther. They come when called...until they just bolt.
I can leash walk them, or even tell them to "Heel" off lead and have them walk behind me, but it just isn't the same fun or exercise, especially when the other dogs are free to explore and zip around.
Is there ANY way I can have my cake and eat it too? According to Cesar, if I am "Pack Leader" they should follow me. But while they are totally deferential to me in all other ways, they are getting bolder and bolder in their excursions. What do all my laidback non-training friends have that I don't?? (Dogs that don't run off obviously!)
"Is there ANY way I can have my cake and eat it too? According to Cesar, if I am “Pack Leader” they should follow me. But while they are totally deferential to me in all other ways, they are getting bolder and bolder in their excursions"
There are lots of techniques you can try...but some might work and some not. One thing, when you have the dogs off-lead, how are you handling it? Do you get excited and give the dogs "permission" to get excited too, or do you quietly take the lead off and not say anything?
If you are getting excited about it, now is the time to STOP THAT! Also, instead of taking the lead off, let them drag it. That gives them a psychological feeling of still being "attached" to you.
Also, you may have to work with them one at a time, let one drag the lead and keep the other close to you...could be their mutual excitement is "feeding" off each other.
Another thing is to obedience train them...if you have read some of my past posts, you will have noticed that I am a proponent of William Koehler's methods of training - though since I have Whippets I've had to modify them a bit. But I strong urge you to get a copy of his basic book "The Koehler Method of Dog Training" - either the current version, or the older one. Either is fine.
Pay close attention to hise system of teaching the recall, especially with the dragging line.
And, finally, here's how I cured a Dalmatian I had of not coming when called: I took her to a big pasture that was bordered on one side by a plantation of pine trees. I just let her roam and didn't say anything to her. When I got very close to the trees I stopped and watched her, and when her back was turned to me, I gave her the "come" command. If she had obeyed I would have praised her and let her roam again, but she didn't...she chose to ignore me. So I stepped back among the trees and watched her.
When she realized she couldn't see me and she started to become frantic about it, I took one step forward (dogs see MOTION very quickly) and repeated the "come" command and she obeyed instantly, for which I gave her many praises...and she never disobeyed that command again.
HEy Doggone, thanks for all the ideas. I will check out my library for Koehler - I have read the Monks of New Skete, but not K.
I have trained my dogs in basic obedience, and fun stuff too like fetching over jumps, rollover, leg weaves etc. I do make them sit and stay calmly before taking off their leashes. I even call them from behind trees so they have to find me in the woods.
Sometimes on a hike they just go into this other mode where they are more bonded with each other and the woods than with me. This never seems to happen with the dogs of my hiking companions, even the ones that generally ignore the come command. THey just naturally stay with their people! Sheesh! I'm so jealous! This is putting a big dent in my favorite activity.
I am really afraid to let a line drag in the woods. The dogs are FAST and even a long long line disappears quickly. I once lost a dog in the woods this way and searched for hours til I found her, wound around and tangled up to her neck of course. Yow! She could have died. Ever since then I only use the long line in a fenced area, unless I am holding the end of it (which quickly gets tangled and caught on roots and rocks when I try to do this in the woods anyway.)
I wish there were some way I could cause them to feel anxious that they are lost, like with your dalmation, or BAD when they come back from a jaunt. I know you can't correct them for coming back! It's like, hey they had their good time and there is no unpleasant consequence at all.
Well I will take your advice and read Koehler. Most obedience books don't say too much about off leash ventures, but maybe there will be a halo effect!
Joanna,
I think it might be the dogs personalities or it might be in their genes. My chow mix is the most dominant dog here, she doesn't want to follow me on a leash, she wants to be in the front, she gets her way quite often. But I can take her off leash anywhere, no matter if it's woods with rabbits, deer etc, or a park full of people and other dogs. She will not go anywhere, and never leaves my side. I often walk her in our neighborhood off the leash.
My husky mix, who is perfect on a leash, and pit bull mix who is not so bad either most of the time follow me on the trails. I don't even have to give them any commands anymore. They just stay behind. But if they see something worth chasing (anything that moves) they forget about me, and go after it. And yes, sometimes hundreds yards away. Like your dogs, they will go out of sight, and it doesn't worry them. Most of the time I am not worried, because they know the park so well, I just don't want them to meet other people, who might complain about dogs running loose.
So to me it doesn't look like training is going to be helpful. Since my least obedient dog does the best. Maybe it's their energy levels, or pray drive. I wish I knew.
When i took one of my dogs to obedience class, they had us get a long thin rope, & let our dogs wonder away while we walked, as they got used to, say, 10 ft, we lengthed it about every 2wks till it got to about 30ft. after that they didn't go more than that far even without the ropes.
Thanks for your response Ewa. Your observations match mine - the well trained dog is not necessarily the dog that is by your side off leash. Ugh! I wish it weren't so though. There must be some way that the "pack leader" philosophy can work in my favor here! I just feel so uncomfortable when the dogs cannot be trusted not to go out of sight, it really limits my enjoyment and the places I can take them (nowhere NEAR a road, nowhere people might get upset, nowhere too far if I have to be on a schedule, etc.)
Thanks for your advice too Bootsmutt. Maybe if I had done that from the beginning...? It is REALLY difficult to use a long line in the woods. Too many obstacles to get tangled on. It's on lead by my side, or free, happy and...GONE!
I wish I knew what Cesar had to say about this. I know he takes his dogs out off-lead. Could there be something I could change in my relationship with my pups that would change their free-wheeling attitude?
I just want to say about neutering/spaying that both of my unspayed dogs in the past developed mammary cancer & had to be put down,eventhough they were both past 10yr.old. with my newest female(now 16mo.) we had her spayed asap when we got her, so she won't have to go thru that.
I love watching the dod whisperer show but have a hard time finding it. NGC channell is constantly changing the day and time. But I will keep looking. My problem which I have not seen Ceasar tackle (I'm sure he has I have just not seen it)is walking my dog without him dragging me down the street. He is a large dog , an alaskan malamute approx 110 lbs. I took him to a dog training class but he must have not paid attention to that part of the lesson. He is taken out twice a day. In the morning my husband runs 2-3 miles with him and he is taken out for a walk around the neighborhood every evening. I use a choke collar and he will pull to the extent of one time knocking himself out. Very scary!! needless to say I am very tired of the comments by others such as whos walking who and is that arm anylonger than the other? I would really like to know how to get him to heel. Any suggustions?
Ann, DW is on at 8:00 pm Friday nights -- that's the regular time slot. Then, repeats are shown at other times, mornings, afternoons, and on weekends. Walking the dog without having him pull is "Cesar 101" -- the Season 1 DVD will be available in a couple of weeks. Get it and watch! Get Cesar's book, too. There's tons of postings on this blog about the very problem you're describing. This is the most basic thing Cesar teaches -- he calls it "mastering the walk." Two quick pointers: put the choke collar right under the dogs ears, like "show dog" style (this will stop him from almost passing out from choking), and hold the leash "like carrying a purse". There should be no tension in the leash. It takes a while to get the feel of this, but it can be done! My dogs outweigh me by 20 lbs, and I was able to do this with just a couple weeks worth of practice. You are already on the right track by walking him 2X a day and having your husb run him. I've personally put a lot of postings recently about making the leash slack, so if you just read the most recent blogs, you'll see some of mine, and of course everybody else too -- like Doggone GA who is very knowledgeable about this particular topic (and many other topics). There are a lot of knowledgeable people blogging here, so read as much as you can, and above all practice, practice, practice. Oh, P.S. just TODAY a man asked me, "are they walking you, or are you walking them?" I usually just laugh (cause they're walking ME ugh). But today, I said, "A little of BOTH!" I felt so triumphant! And this is because I practiced for weeks on end to get them to stop pulling me. They no longer pull (and neither do I, which is also part of the problem -- the human pulls back). It is like a dream come true to be able to walk with slack leashes!
Ann -I have the "Dog Whisperer" newsletter sent to my email address and the TV schedule air dates are listed there for you to look at. Cesar is on in the morning hours during the week. At 8:00 pm on Friday evenings and sometimes on Sunday mornings.
To Doggone/GA,
I can't tell you what a relief it is to see your postings regarding responsible owners keeping their dogs intact. I have been slammed, insulted and generally made to feel guilty about not having neutered my puppy yet. I may if it's best for his health, but so long as no problems arise I don't plan too.
It seems like everyone in this country has been brainwashed into thinking all dogs should be neutered and to have it done as young puppies. I too have nothing against people who want to do this with their dogs but I wish more people could understand why I want to make my own choice in the matter.
Thank you for your posts.
Chris,
Thank you. I absolutely refust to feel guilty about my intact dogs though. They can't make you feel guilty unless you let them! The whole point of the neutering "movement" is to reduce unwanted litters and as long as my dogs are not contributing to that problem, then from the point of view OF that problem they are "virtually" neutered.
Yes, some of them have been bred - but THOSE were not UNWANTED litters!
ANY ADVICE OUT THERE ON HOW TO STOP MY NEIGHBORS' TWO BEAGELS FROM CONSTANTLY BARKING (DAY AND/OR NIGHT)???
I'm a cancer patient on chemo with an irregular sleeping schedule. Dogs have an in/out door so there's no keeping them inside, and every time neighbors travel, they are out all day. Husband and I have tried all "kind"s of things in past five years with little or no results -
* Ask neighbors nicely in person
* Knock on door and ask
* Call the neighbors and ask kindly
* Call and ask police to stop it (they can't unless they hear dogs barking and someone is at home), dogs "miraculously" shut-up when cruiser parks out front, or neighbors "ar not home."
* talked with prosecutor who sent letter (things got somewhat better for awhile).
* called and left message with humane society that dogs were out barking all day while neighbors had been gone all week. No response.
Example of neighbor's response to us:
* he waddled over to our yard, Scotch glass in hand, and said if we would just keep "our rabbits" out of sight, the dogs wouldn't bark! I explained we don't have any rabbits, we all live on a ravine - and so do the rabbits.
* after a non-stop barking day, my husband called and the wife said they were trying to do the "humane thing" and trap the rabbits to release in a park. My hubby asked if they could do the humane thing NOW and stop the dogs from barking so his sick wife could get some rest.
* Dogs bark at any sound, sight or movement - it ain't just the bunnies!
I really don't want to take the next step advised by prosecutor (tape the dogs for 20 minutes and get other neghbors to corroborate), then take to court. I'm afraid the first time after that when we have guests on our deck, they dog owners' will call cops on us (they seem to be those type of people). I want to vengence on either side. I just want the dogs to SHUT UP.
PLEASE, PLEASE HELP! Does anyone know of a device (soundless) I could play out of my window tho get the noise to stop? Or any other tricks?
Thanking you in advance (and hoping you can send help soon!)
-Suzanne
Oops, a typo in above note #172: sentence above should say "I want NO vengence on either side. I just want the dos to SHUT UP."
-Suzanne
Dear Suzanne,
Have you ever suggested bark collars? OKAY - WAIT EVERYONE - I DON'T MEAN THE BATTERY/SHOCK ONES. I've seen some that spray a solution whenever the dog barks. Does anyone know about them? Are they any good?
Your right "Beagles" will bark at anything. I HAVE ONE. They don't just bark they have a baying park. I wouldn't trade her for anything, but I don't think I could stand owning more than one either. Mine spends most of her day outside when the weather permits. But she doesn't start barking until late afternoon and once the sun goes down there's nothing in the world that will keep her quiet. She will not stay in the yard after dark by herself for anything. I wish I could offer some wisdom but I'm fresh out. I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!!!!! What about a dog whistle? It would get their attention. But then you would have to blow it. Oh well, I tried. Good luck.
Wow those are definitely the neighbors from hell! And whatever action you take against them you still have to live next to them. What a terrible bind.
How about your husband taking out a super soaker and shooting them in the face with water whenever they bark? I once took a dog class where the instructor said to give a quick squirt in the snout with a plant sprayer combined with the "quiet" command (or better yet, hand gesture as doggone pointed out) when the dog won't stop barking. It did in fact work! Soon the gesture alone, especially if it mimics the shooting gesture, should be enough. Or the sight of the squirter!
To get even quicker results you could mix a little bit of white vinegar into the solution. I hope I don't get flamed here for being cruel, but we once did this with a friend's dog to save his -the dog's that is - life. He was a dedicated car chaser - aussie mix - and he would weave back and forth in that herding pattern right under the wheels. (He knew when he was off-leash, so a long line correction didn't help.) We drove past his house a few times and squirted him with the mixture. After the first two times, he stopped absolutely and lay calmly on the front steps. He just decided it wasn't fun any more.
I did try this on myself (OK it was by accident I admit, I squirted my face when I put the top on) and it made my eyes sting, but not horribly, nothing to approach real pain, and it went away really soon. I think it was worth it.
hellow there all! greetings from richmond ca. i just wanted everyone to know that in this episode my beautiful & missed sister theresa was teamed up with the dog named etta. i just wanted to thank whomever had this great idea for this show! pure genius! not only does it help some much deserving quadripeds out but it keeps some wonderful bipeds buisy on the way to rehabilitation. so... thank you whoever you or yall may be. and on a side note if anyone wanted to ya know commensary donations to the lovely THERESA M WORTMAN is allways welcome! baby gotta eat yall! anyways much love to all dog owners and all rehabilitation hopefulls! one day at a time folks! one day at a time. big brother justin richmond ca. {the city of no pitty}
I have an intact pug who is very healthy and happy at age 10 with less behavior problems than most pugs I've met. Why didn't I neuter him, I purchased him from a vet (who has him as a pet for a few months for reasons I don't want to get into) and asked the vet right away. His answer, "Let him keep his boys." So I did. I trusted that vet who had loved my pug for the last four months more than any vet I've seen since (I moved out of state!)
I have no problem with people promoting nuetering to lower the unwanted pet population, but do not try to make me feel bad/guilty/ashamed/irresponsible because I did not follow your beliefs. The best way to argue your point is to understand both sides, not trying to make others feel bad because they don't agree. People are entiteled to their own opinions and as long as they act responsibly, hsould be allowed to make their own decisions.
HI, this is Kijana Adamson, and I've only seen your show a couple of times, but I absolutly LOVE it! I've tried some of your techniques with my dog, and they have really helped. She likes to pull on her leash when I'm walking her, and now she doesn't. IT's a lot easier to handle her.
This is wonderful, not only does it help the animals but it helps the inmates. I think all prisons should have a program like this, it is a win win situation.
We have a 4 month old Great Dane that is doing pretty well with obedience and housetraining. My husband wants him to remain "intact", and I want to get him neutered because of previous experience with male dogs that cannot control their urges (i.e. jump fences, spray in the house, bother visitors in inappropriate ways, etc.) This pup is expected to get to be nearly 200 lbs. Can we train him to not do these things - even when there is a female in heat in the area?
Cat,
This can be quite a hot topic, of whether to neuter or not. Personally, I believe that it is worth it both health-wise and society-wise to neuter your pet. Unless you are a reputable breeder who is trying to improve a specific breed, there is no guarantee that your dane won't get out and impregnate a female in heat. Then you are adding to the problem of the millions of animals that are put down each year because they do not have an owner.
But, that's my speech on neutering. I am sure there is a way to prevent your dane from spraying in the house and bothering visitors. But this means you must monitor him 24/7 when he is not in his crate. With visitors, you will have to address any issues that come up with humping, etc. He should never be allowed to hump anyone, but he will probably hump things in your house b/c there will be hormones raging through his body pretty soon. You cannot fight nature.
As far as jumping the fence, you will have to be with him when he is outside to ensure that he does not get lose by jumping the fence. I do not know how high danes can jump, but I assume pretty high, especially if they can smell a female in heat. I knew a golden retreiver male who used to jump a six foot fence that had electricity running through it (in an attempt to keep him in) and he ended up breaking his neck in the process.
Just keep working with the obedience training and becoming his pack leader and you should be able to control his behavior. It is alot more work when you have an unneutered animal though, so be prepared to be on constant alert so as not to add to the population of unwanted pets.
Best of luck, Cat.
Thanks Kate. I figured there must be a way to train them to control their urges - I mean, aren't there show dogs in the ring that are still intact? Maybe I'll make a deal with my husband that we hot wire the fence with the surgery money we're not spending -- as well as keep working dilligently on the pup's training. He has been an excellent trainee so far. Much easier than our first dane. But perhaps we have learned a lot since then too.
Eddie800 pokersmj
Oh,what a beautiful blog! I like it very much! I'm agreeable to your point of view!
my name is 整形 I hope to make feiends with you !
I have 3 dogs (a golden retriever, his son and an australian cattle-dog husky mix). My golden is trained for hunting and has no fears of the gun but lately has been fearful of thunderstorms. His fear has gotten so bad that he has broken down his kennel door. I refuse to let him come lay with us instead of his kennel because I do not want to reinforce his bad behavior. However, putting him back in his kennel does not work either because he breaks out again within minutes (usually 2 or 3). I have considered tranquilizers but since he is 10 years old, I'd rather not use them. His fear seems to be "spreading" to the other dogs so I try to keep them away from him when he is freaking out. I understand that he is not afraid of the guns when hunting because he has a job to do but what job can he possibly have when he is in his kennel at night? Any help would be great.
Today - Zoey, a beautiful 9yr greyhound in Mesa AZ was forced to go over the rainbow bridge. She was turned in to the animal control by her owners due to so called agressive behavior and she so called bit other dogs and people (no reports were made prior to her being turned in). Despite efforts of local greyhound adoption/rescue groups and despite support of greyhound owners from coast to coast, the Country Atty overruled the shelters agreement to turn the dog over to the rescue group and she was forcefully taken from this world. Things like this should not happen. Greyhounds are bred for the entertainment of people - once they are retired and living in a home - AND PRIOR- they do not deserve to be treated like this. They - like most animals - only know what they learn from people - people who are suppose to be the intelligent breed. "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated."
Mohandas Gandhi Run Free Sweet Zoey.
I love The Dog Whisperer and Cesar. I haven;t seen any episodes with Bull Terriers. I have a male 4 month old who does constant tail chasing. I know this is a problem with the breed but can anyone help? We love this dog and want to know how to keep him from constantly chasing his tail.
Virginia
Add a Comment